0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
QuoteAh I see.. So, us as a whole, don't care if we are harmed, or changed.. As long as we carry on to make more?well we care, but the DNA does not.
Ah I see.. So, us as a whole, don't care if we are harmed, or changed.. As long as we carry on to make more?
note: i am making this up as i go along, but it does sound rather good and convincing. i am quite pleased with myself and may have to do more thinking which tends to hurt. maybe the DNA does not want me to know the truth.
Why is it that quoting doesn't work for me? It says "The following error or errors occurred while posting this message:"
quoteHang on Paul.. a HOST for the Dna? So why does the DNA want to carry on? Again, we are back to square 1. Let's say that we are just ONE Dna? Why does the DNA want to carry on living?end quoteok, very quickly and off the top of my head.what is the purpose of the DNA and why once it has made more does it allow you some extra free will, why does it not want you to live for ever so it can make even more of itself.think of the DNA as the royal family, what is the purpose of the King, Queen or ruling monarch? to make the next king, going around opening fetes and having nice banquites is all well and good but the main purpose is to carry on the blood line.this is what the DNA is doing, it knows that "we" as a host are not perfect and succeptable to desease and infection but it is the best it has. once you have done your royal duty and made the next generation of DNA it's job is done.controversial note here and not my opinions just a quick thought.If god was DNA and not some high being on anothe plain, this could be why homosexuality is frowned upon! no chance of making more DNA.note i have gay friends...the above just makes sense if DNA was godbath time...hoping for a eureka moment!
Hang on Paul.. a HOST for the Dna? So why does the DNA want to carry on? Again, we are back to square 1. Let's say that we are just ONE Dna? Why does the DNA want to carry on living?
Ok then.. Sidetracking away from this.. What is the point in us being here. In us living? We all know that we are to die. One day. Is it really that we were sent down to look after "God's" creation?
Quote from: seanahnuk on 11/04/2007 15:19:05Hang on Paul.. a HOST for the Dna? So why does the DNA want to carry on? Again, we are back to square 1. Let's say that we are just ONE Dna? Why does the DNA want to carry on living?Quote from: seanahnuk on 11/04/2007 15:09:03Ok then.. Sidetracking away from this.. What is the point in us being here. In us living? We all know that we are to die. One day. Is it really that we were sent down to look after "God's" creation?Systems depend upon rules that govern their behaviour in order to sustain themselves. The DNA contains the rules that govern the behaviour of the cells (note – when we are talking about multicellular organisms, it is the behaviour of the cells the govern rather than the behaviour of the total organism, although ofcourse the behaviour of the total organism is itself controlled by the cells that compose it). In some ways, the information in the DNA can be seen to be to a cell what a body of law are to a country – the law is a necessity, but not a definition of a country. Furthermore, a law book does not constitute the law itself, it is merely a form of physical storage for the law – so too, the DNA does not define the rules by which cell behaves, it is merely the physical storage in which those rules are stored.Yes, it is true that the information that is contained within the DNA (the genes) do perpetuate themselves, and in that respect we are the servants of our genes, but a servant is not the same as his master, despite the relationship between them.The question was, what are 'we', not what governs us – they are different questions.In the same way that a member (citizen or resident) of a country, is subservient to the laws of that country, and is required to uphold and perpetuate those laws, but nonetheless the individual person still has an identity that is separate from the law, despite being subservient to it.
controversial note here and not my opinions just a quick thought.If god was DNA and not some high being on anothe plain, this could be why homosexuality is frowned upon! no chance of making more DNA.note i have gay friends...the above just makes sense if DNA was god
Another_Someone, just one curious question to ask. When does my status from Newbie, change? I made this account a couple of days ago, because I had a science question which needed answering. Fun site though, to share our thoughts []
Newbie * 0 Jr. Member ** 50 Full Member *** 100 Sr. Member **** 250 Hero Member ***** 500 Neilep Level Member ****** 6000 Too Much Free Time Level Member ********** 9000
well no eureka moment, but as with all theories they keep evolving. i now wonder if the DNA picked us as a host not because we were the best it could find but because we were adaptive. It may have seen how we evolved and thought that our own evolution would benefit its own evolution.As humans got smarter so did the DNA.If the DNA is god then it would know that repdoduction was impossible through homosexual relations, but because we are adaptive and skilled even homosexuals can noe have children through scientific methods - another good reason for the DNA choosing us as a host.The DNA needs to keep the "blood lines" going for it's own survival and evolution, it is, or at least thinks it is the ruler and in control...or something, i am still working on it.Yes, George it is fun.As for when do you stop being a newbie - once you pst enough stupid questions and answers. look at me full member - lots of stupid q and a's!no seriously it goes on how many posts you make.
The DNA picking us as a host.. I think that's quite understandable. Just like viruses pick on humans to live on, DNA's do the same?