0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
said it was a positive mono-pole integer, integer does mean interior?
Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 11:48:15 said it was a positive mono-pole integer, integer does mean interior?You now need to say what you mean by " positive mono-pole integer"And, re. "integer does mean interior?".No, an integer is a whole number with no fractions or decimals.That's part of the problem with your foolish refusal to start by learning the basics.
a ''volume'' in a matrix, the interior
OK, so now you need to explain what you think this means.Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 13:07:40a ''volume'' in a matrix, the interior
the interior of the defined parameters of the matrix
OK, so now you need to explain what you think this means.Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 13:13:49the interior of the defined parameters of the matrix
The parameters of the Matrix are the boundary and within that boundary.
Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 17:13:14The parameters of the Matrix are the boundary and within that boundary.What boundary?
The boundary defined by the Matrix's dimensions R³ = m * m * m = 1*1*1 for example
Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 17:22:17The boundary defined by the Matrix's dimensions R³ = m * m * m = 1*1*1 for exampleThat's nonsense because a matrix only has two dimensions.And if you abandoned your policy of refusing to learn the basics, you might have known that and not wasted all this time.
What do you think R3 is?
Each point (or set of points in) it in it can be labelled with a matrix. That matrix has 2 dimensions- columns and rows.
Why can't we have a 3 dimensional matrix?
Does it really matter as long as I explain the context of use?
I understand what you are saying but 3d is doable
Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 21:59:23Why can't we have a 3 dimensional matrix? Because it's not a matrix- for example, the rukes of matrix multiplication couldn't be applied to it.Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 21:59:23Does it really matter as long as I explain the context of use? You have barely explained anything yet.Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 21:59:23I understand what you are saying but 3d is doableQuite possibly, but since the maths for it is, as yet, undefined, you can't reasonably say that you have done anything yet.
define the space to have an inner array
I have given science the information,
neutral will always be attracted to neutral.
Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 23:29:36 define the space to have an inner array You will need to explain that.Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 23:29:36I have given science the information,You have given nothing but nonsense.Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2018 23:29:36neutral will always be attracted to neutral.And yet, they are not.That's why things bounce off eachother.
neutral will always be attracted to neutral.And yet, they are not.That's why things bounce off eachother.