0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Too many people expect their leaders to perform like actors, playing the role of statesman. Trump does not play by these rules. He is bored with the horse and pony show. He is a man of action, behind the scenes and does not pretend just for the camera. Two different skill sets are required to be a political leader in the modern era. When you run for office, it is better to be an actor, controlled by writers, directors, producers. These handlers might set up a mud slinging TV drama, with the candidate playing the role of holier than thou. This appeals to the expectations of the masses, who have been conditioned, using media templates. Money is very important for the base conditioning and the directed sales pitch of the actor. Political actor skills, although critical for modern campaigns, does not always translate to best on the job skills, since the latter requires applied skills, more than acting skills. While the best applied skills may not translate to the best acting skills needed for campaigns. As an example, your favorite TV doctor becomes what people expect from an ideal doctor, even though that person has no medical degree. He or she is a product of staged direction and mass conditioning. This reinforced expectation is media driven; money and promotion, and will make some people think that a real surgeon is not qualified, because he does not seem to know how to hold the knife with flare. Trump knows the media is full of crap and is really a business in it for the money. They benefit by actors playing the role of statesmen, since this creates and supports a lot of media related jobs. Trump is on the media union crap list because he has applied skills and is not doing a good actor job. He refuses to hire all the needed illusionists to satisfy mass expectations that have been already conditioned into the herd. Trump is not a friend of Hollywood who promotes their own kind.
The rules and regulations are nothing compared to the freedom people have in the US......"and that's the problem"....."immigration".
Anything else to say?
Before that it was "Rome"....."England's" "Indians".
Does "Rome" really need "England"? Seriosuly, right?
Does "Rome" really need "England"? Seriosuly, right?I know what I would say.I would use "enlgish" terms, and the words would be cheap, like they should be.I will still keep using English, because I know how cheap it is."paleface"? Really? What you've said justifies an investigation, beyond someone posting a "Kermit the frog" video.Sure, this is a "light" section, but that's compared to "physics". Maybe we should learn to not use words and terms even on this so-called sub-physics level that might offend people?
As far as I know Trump is a good guy.
What if we talk about the Ventriloquist?What's the dummy saying?Any ideas?