0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I only say that if you dont agree that Noether theorem states that there is some "now" within the block universe, then you are stupid.
Please provide an authoritative source where Noether's theorem supports such a thing.
Secondly, don't insult people on this board. It's against the rules.
I believe the usual meme here is "Tell me you don't understand Noether's theorem without saying you don't understand Noether's theorem".
Me ?
If i say you are stupid because you are not understanding some obvious, thing i do not insult you.
I inform you.
But it is not too late to start your brain.
You're the one who made the claim, so yes, you.
It's a (not so subtly) veiled attempt to call Bored Chemist stupid because he recognizes that Noether's theorem isn't about "nows" in time.
Then back it up with an authoritative source. So far, it just looks like your misinformed opinion.
Another implication that we aren't thinking clearly. Again, provide a source.
So yes, i agree to be "the authoritativ source" (do you even understand what you say).
You just said two lines above that i am the one with the authorative source.
So you cant be sure of anything if nobody has never thought of something new ?
Please be more specific.
What parts of relativity do you think are illusions? Seems like an easy question. Is time dilation an illusion? Is length contraction an illusion?
And another thing to point out about illusions is that they aren't real for anyone. Illusions are things that only look real. So saying that, "X is true for one person but not for another" doesn't mean that X is an illusion
I dont agree
(you can tell me stupid if you like, like i did for you, i myself dont care of any external opinion, so stop saying (without saying it directly but i am not stupid and i know when you insult me !) i am stupid, and i will stop saying you are stupid)
It is what localy happens.
If it actually happened, then it's not an illusion.
This is exactly what i say.
EVERYTHING that depends on this localy reality is at some point some illusion.
Dont try to fool me with such primitiv recursif trick.
What insult ?
Dont call mommy.
(calling mommy is not an example)
Those two statements are contradictory.When are you going to give us that link I asked for?
But the interesting thing is that you don't seem to understand that you are insulting people.Do you behave like that in real life?
This is exactly what i say.What happens localy is not an illusion :This is what we can call reality.EVERYTHING that depends on this localy reality is at some point some illusion.(Yes i am sorry , many of our experimentation of the world is illusion).
Not sure you really understand anything (thats why i suppose you could be stupid).
The point remains; you don't understand Noether's theorem.