0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Joe Newman's energy motor was observed to output more energy than it used.
Newman claims that the motor derives its power by converting some of the mass of the copper in the coils into usable energy,
Well since it is a perpetual motion machine, doesn't work and violates conservation laws it is not the best argument for your case.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newman's_energy_machine
Quote from: timey on 01/03/2017 22:32:43Joe Newman's energy motor was observed to output more energy than it used.Not according to NewmanQuoteNewman claims that the motor derives its power by converting some of the mass of the copper in the coils into usable energy,
Positively charged electrons? I hear Maxwell turning...
I have read an account by a senior engineer of a motor manufacturing company that attempted to manufacture a motor to Newman's design. he found that Newman was ignorant of the basic techniques of motor design and considered him a con artist.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Joe_Newman
If potential energy can be thought to increase electron energy, (ie: charge), then this describes why positively charged electrons are found at top of thunder cloud, and negatively charged electrons are found at bottom of thunder cloud.