301
New Theories / Re: What is the relationahip between mass and charge?
« on: 16/02/2020 22:53:09 »One relationship between charge and mass, based on the preponderance of natural data, is positive charge appears to prefer to merge with the heavy mass; proton. The negative charge prefers to merge with the lessor mass; electron. There is more of these two change-mass configurations in the universe, than the alternative, where charge-mass is reversed.
Since when did charge merge with anything? Protons and electrons automatically come with their charge. Also, the W bosons are both much more massive than either the proton or the neutron, but they come in either positively or negatively-charged forms.
Equation one for the MKS system is not valid for any other system unless we change the constants.
Which means the equation is wrong. You don't have to change the constants to get the right answer between measurement systems in truly accurate equations such as the kinetic energy equation. It is 0.5mv2. This works for any measurement system without having to change the constants. Here is an example:
For metric:
Ek = (0.5) x (1 kilogram) x (100 meters per second)2
Ek = 0.5 x 1 x 10,000
Ek = 0.5 x 10,000
Ek = 5,000 joules
For imperial:
Ek = (0.5) x (0.0685218 slugs) x (328.084 feet per second)2
Ek = 0.5 x 0.0685218 x 107,639.111
Ek = 0.0342609 x 107,639.111
Ek = 3687.81 foot-pounds
Since 1 joules equals 0.737562 foot-pounds, multiplying 5,000 joules by 0.737562 should give the same result as calculated in the Imperial equation. And, indeed, 5,000 x 0.737562 = 3,687.81 foot-pounds. So the equation gives the same result without having to change either of the constants (the 0.5 and the exponent of 2).
The following users thanked this post: pzkpfw