1
Just Chat! / Re: What is Trump's opinion about chemtrails?
« on: 22/07/2016 22:07:59 »
Ehhhh. They ain't hurtin ya... No need to sweat 'em so much...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think I might just put away my textbooks and read Evans posts instead.
This is new to me as well. Can you post a link to or reference for this article?
“Begin with a “primordial cloud of hydrogen and helium, suffused in a sea of ultraviolet radiation,” Bromm said. “You crunch this cloud in the gravitational field of a dark-matter halo. Normally, the cloud would be able to cool, and fragment to form stars. However, the ultraviolet photons keep the gas hot, thus suppressing any star formation. These are the desired, near-miraculous conditions: collapse without fragmentation! As the gas gets more and more compact, eventually you have the conditions for a massive black hole.”
This Naked Science Scrapbook episode on the Higgs will be helpful for you:
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?board=12;action=post2
PS: Mr Box, I know that you are familiar with this definition. So why do you keep asking?
I ask and keep asking because my discussion always ends without a conclusion to my question.
I think that I would all that a lie. I am pretty sure that Thebox asks these questions because Thebox has his own, special answer independent from any scientific work ever done on the question and Thebox wants to try to share this special answer with people.
I am also going to ask something else here. Think of the most horrifying dream you had and how horrible that felt. The negative feelings/emotions in our nightmares tend to be far more worse than the ones we have when we are awake. The ones we have in our nightmares are like abnormal mental states that we just simply don't experience in our waking lives.I can only go from my own experiences. The most upsetting dream was when I saw the souls of man flowing toward the light at the center of the Earth. There they were absorbed unto the collective. I was only the observer but at the time being collectivized into the light of the natural God was frightening. Yet that is what many people see. It took a long time to recover from that dream. In the end the process is not horrible but a loving transisition from an individual soul to a collective soul of the Earth God.
Now during ndes, people say they are conscious. That it is more real than real. So does the fact that they are conscious make the negative feelings/emotions they experience during their ndes not as bad? Or are they just as bad as they are in our nightmares? Are they experiencing their negative feelings/emotions just as they would in their nightmares, or are they experiencing them normally like when we are awake?
The experience of the awake dreams or hallucinations involved intense fright and fear. Our eyes normally see outward. Yet during these experiences we lose control of our vision. We are lost in a different world. The vision is intensely powerful with powerful colors which we do not normally see with our regular vision. The audio is strong. There is great fear that we will not be able to recover to a normal state, that we will be lost in a world of dreams. It is fearful and hopeless.
When driving things would repeat over and over again. fortunately I got split images so that part of my vision could see the road and part of my vision could see the information. Thus I was tortured by the visions or awake dreams but I was not destroyed.
Anyway that was a long time ago and fortunately I have not experienced such things lately. But it took over 20 years to recover from the experiences.
Jesus was but a man.. as any other man.. except he had delusions of grandeur and the intellect and ego to totally play his society at the time as total friggin fools, played a part, the suckers bought it, and thousands of years later billions of suckers still buy it, making him one of the greatest liars of all history. But a man nonetheless, same as anyone else, and he's now not even a rotting corpse any longer, but instead a pile of bones. A nothing. A nobody. That's a fact. No, god did not send his son here to die for your sins, no, there is not some magic fairy realm, no, jesus did not 'ascend up to heaven', which technically would've been him flying off the planet sideways, no, he did not rise from the dead blah blah blah. I mean seriously, you're on a science forum, so you've gotta have some knowledge of science. So c'mon, be objective. Step out of your brainwashing. Objectively look at the situation and realize how ludicrously insane it is to believe. How you'd have to literally suspend belief in all you've ever learned about physics and science. What has science ever, friggin ever shown you, that would lead you to believe any of it all could be true whatsoever? What have you ever learned about the way the universe works that would lend credibility to our souls flying to heaven when we die, of anybody being able to rise from the dead after 3 days, of any body flying off to heaven (though it would've been sideways), or any of the magic fairy man in the sky bull that so many believe? Gimme a break. Use your head. Religion is a farce for those too ignorant to see reality. Admit it to yourself. You'll feel better, and liberated.In that case, whatever it is is a fake, by definition, or an irrelevant original. Either way, it isn't a sound basis for developing a theory of anything other than human gullibility.I did not develop a theory about the shroud. It is just an example in my books of the interaction of higher light speed energy and our light speed C energy. And to me it points out the possibility that Jesus was a cosmic reincnarnate.
It isn't about science.
Precisely.
It's never about science with you or IAMREALITY.
That's exactly why it's impossible to converse with either one of you on this "science forum".
~
Fortunately, I understand that the soporific effects of the drug discourages cannabis users from trying to drive a vehicle immediately.
Where are you getting your information from?
I've driven for 20+ years either before/during or after smoking and I've had zero accidents or speeding tickets.... and I'm 40.
Similar scenarios with other individuals are virtually endless.
They would have all sorts of trouble convincing me of such. I'd be intelligent enough to know that they're like, just really intelligent and stuff. I would also probably feel more like I'm home, rather than stuck on a planet of retarded monkeys as I oftentimes feel lol. But I bow down to no one. Ever. Period.
We know our universe is almost unimaginable ancient when compared to our the history of our civilisation. Thus it is logical given the vast boundless universe of untold billions of stars and even more planets that there might be other civilisation a billion years in advance of ours.
And they would have absolutely no problem convincing you they were Almighty God or make you bow down and worship them as deities.
So why not go a step further and imagine an intelligence that is beyond human comprehension , that has created the universe, set its boundaries and mathematic laws in which to sustain its existence.
If you could go back to the middle ages, with all the paraphernalia of our modern world and demonstrate some of it on the primitives, they would bow down and worship you as God incarnate.
God is just a huge extrapolation on that reasoning. Our universe is bound up by cause and effect, but it can't go back forever at some point the must be something everlasting outside the confines of time an "Uncaused Cause" of all existence and that my friend is the Almighty God who you so passionately dispise.This couldn't be further from the truth. God is no such thing. And the god you reference, the god you always speak of, the silly non existent god of established religion, is no such thing. And I wouldn't criticize anyone for holding that specific point of view, in fact, I've even repeatedly said I make no claims to knowing that such a type of god doesn't exist, but that it would have zero to do with established religion, and it wouldn't be sentient nor able to answer prayer. But you can't ascribe to the god of religion, try and cram it down our throats repeatedly even, then try and come off reasonable with the above as your defense. Cause we know it's not what you truly believe. But I would make a few points of note on the statement anyway though. First off, yes, it can go back forever. No, there doesn't have to be something everlasting whatsoever (that's fact). And furthermore, though there can be an uncaused cause, if there was a specific cause it still doesn't mean for even a second that there would be a darn thing almighty about it at all. Nor that it had to be sentient, or intelligent, or anything more than merely, well, a cause. And no, that is not the god I despise, you are wrong there. I would not despise such a god. I despise the god of religion. The fake god. The one that doesn't exist. The one that's used for so much evil, the one with its silly laws, and contradictory rules, that supposedly decides what babies live, whose wives die (yes I'm a widower), and that considers people every bit as decent and admirable as anyone else to be sinners and worthy of contempt or death. The little silly magic man in the sky that people give up their strength to, that they hold responsible for everything, that they thank for everything (the doctor didn't save their life right? But god. So ridiculous), the god that rules politics, and keeps society from so much intellectual advancement. That is the god I so passionately despise. The crutch of a god, the god that causes a block of true intellect and vision. That is not the god you are referencing above, even if I still disagree with your reasoning for it.
Help? Lmao. All you did in that thread was tell the patient what the competent Dr said they had was a fake disease, even though it's fact that it isn't with mountains upon mountains of evidence that proves it, then diagnosed them instead with something they almost certainly don't have lol. No, you helped no one in that thread at all. But I guess we should keep that fight there.
Go look through my post history and you'll see I gladly help others when the opportunity arises [take the CFS thread as an example].
Quote from: IAMREALITYno one has ever died as a result of ingesting too much [cannabis]
That is a bold statement.
It is known that people who try to drive a vehicle after ingesting cannabis show severely impaired control of the vehicle. So I am sure that it would have killed someone, somewhere.
Fortunately, I understand that the soporific effects of the drug discourages cannabis users from trying to drive a vehicle immediately.
I believe this claim can be true if modified to something along the lines of "cannabis has such a high LD50 that there have never been any deaths as a direct result of toxicity associated with overdose"
Obviously, people who are high out of their minds can do things that may pose a danger to themselves or others (especially when vehicles, guns, or chainsaws are involved...)