0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The W- boson contains negative charge, but this negative change is only affective at very close range.
Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2020 14:40:58The W- boson contains negative charge, but this negative change is only affective at very close range.Citation needed.
The W- boson is connected to the weak nuclear force which only works at close range.
Quote from: puppypower on 06/05/2020 12:16:02The W- boson is connected to the weak nuclear force which only works at close range.I'm not asking about the range of the weak nuclear force. I'm asking for a citation that supports your assertion that the electric field of the W- is "short-ranged", unlike every other electric field we know of.
The weak force is so named because although it is stronger than gravity, it is only effective at very short distances (10-18 m). Technically, it is one of the strongest forces, but because the particles involved are so big, their travel is limited to the short distance listed above. The W and Z bosons that make the weak force weigh in at 80 GeV and 91 GeV respectively. This is in comparison to the proton, which weighs .9 GeV.
This was based on inference. The W- boson is connected to the weak nuclear force. The weak nuclear force is short range.
This negative charge helps to stabilize positive charge repulsion within the nucleus.
However, being short range, the W- has no impact on the electrons within atomic orbitals. However, electrons within orbitals should be able to impact the W- bosons, since the negative charges of electron are long range.
Quote from: puppypower on 07/05/2020 11:50:38This was based on inference. The W- boson is connected to the weak nuclear force. The weak nuclear force is short range.Non-sequitur. You can't say that its electric field is short-ranged because the weak force is short-ranged. That would make no sense.Quote from: puppypower on 07/05/2020 11:50:38This negative charge helps to stabilize positive charge repulsion within the nucleus.No it doesn't, because there aren't normally W- bosons in the nucleus. Well, except for virtual W- bosons. But that's irrelevant because there would also be virtual W+ bosons there as well. Those virtual particles have no effect on the net charge of the nucleus, so they cannot contribute to its stability against electric repulsion.Quote from: puppypower on 07/05/2020 11:50:38However, being short range, the W- has no impact on the electrons within atomic orbitals. However, electrons within orbitals should be able to impact the W- bosons, since the negative charges of electron are long range.That claim violates Newton's third law. If the W- bosons can feel the electric repulsion of the electrons' negative charge, then the electrons must also feel that same repulsion from the W- bosons.
That is complete nonsense. One particle feeling the field of the other but not vice versa would result in violation of conservation of momentum. So we know that your conclusion on it is wrong. Not to mention that your idea that the electric field of the W- boson is short-ranged because the weak force is short-ranged is as ridiculous as saying that a car's headlight beams must only be able to go as far as the car itself can. The electromagnetic force is not limited in the way that the weak force is.
Wouldn't atomic charge balance require fewer orbital electrons?
Quote from: puppypower on 11/05/2020 13:55:39Wouldn't atomic charge balance require fewer orbital electrons?No, because (1) they are virtual W- bosons, and (2) an equal amount of virtual W+ bosons would be present. That makes the net charge zero.
Mass creates a stable discontinuity between the c-reference and all possible inertial states.
As a consequence, the hydrogen atom with its spin up proton and spin down electron, can be viewed from its opposite side as an anti-hydrogen atom with a spin-down proton and a spin-up electron.