0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Kryptid on 07/06/2023 16:54:34Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 07/06/2023 05:15:48Quote from: Kryptid on 06/06/2023 05:41:23My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.why does an aether have to exist for my temperature theory to be true?Because you said that it involved the aether.No pope. I just call it the aether because you people are so high strung on semantics. call it what you want, you still aren't going to find anything in the universe without tempetature?
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 07/06/2023 05:15:48Quote from: Kryptid on 06/06/2023 05:41:23My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.why does an aether have to exist for my temperature theory to be true?Because you said that it involved the aether.
Quote from: Kryptid on 06/06/2023 05:41:23My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.why does an aether have to exist for my temperature theory to be true?
My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.
elements that have cube numbers like 27 and 64, and their neighboring elements, make up the magnetic compounds.
Also, we know that the magnetic properties are largely determined by the electrons, not the nucleus.
But north and south are determined by the nucleus.
The stationary heat around the nucleus I speak of creates a gravity field. It is bound to the nucleus. Electricity in the electric shell is stationary conventional transferring heat.
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 09/06/2023 01:49:18But north and south are determined by the nucleus.Nope.
So is a nuclei hot? any takers?
obviously they are as a small amount of fusion material can produce a lot of heat? what inside the nuclei converts to heat when they bond?
Mine is that fusion causes cratering of the nuclei, putting a portion of the nucleus into orbit and releasing some of its gravity field as a a wave of heat. But I bicker with myself.
The mass defect (the difference in mass between the nuclei that fused together versus the nucleus that was produced) is expressed in the form of increased particle velocities (the resulting nuclei and subatomic particles produced by the reaction are moving quickly).
Is that supposed to be empirical knowledge?
Quote from: Kryptid on 19/06/2023 02:44:34The mass defect (the difference in mass between the nuclei that fused together versus the nucleus that was produced) is expressed in the form of increased particle velocities (the resulting nuclei and subatomic particles produced by the reaction are moving quickly).Is that supposed to be empirical knowledge? It like a lot of the 'empirical' knowledge out there, backed by the insults, its a sort of offense, I wonder if someday I'll have to do something legal about that? Not to anyone here but people like that with pfft actual....you know.....power and stuff. heheh
Well i guess the naked genius powerless troll friends have spoken!
Well i guess the naked genius powerless troll friends have spoken! The big CS wheel of money beats soul every time. Every GD time.
What is that supposed to mean?