0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Then the field of the central body would be applying blue shift to the incoming photon. There would be two opposite time dilation effects.
Mr. timeyWell, here i am sharing mine ideas on gravitational time dilation. Right from the starting we are looking at the one side of the coin only. At present we are of the view that outside area is empty and in case if that is true then why don't we measure speed of light in open area. It is true that certainly there is a influence. Each photon released from the clock is not free from outside influence. Unless a new photon is released and makes a way there is no pressure or force and this pressure causes movement of particles. In a constant gravitational field, your watch, needles, photons and EMF everything is undergoing constant pressure. When velocity is gained, everything is relaxed from gravity and the release of photons slows down. Unless a new photon is released your watch fails to gain KE. "Time dilation is only a simple instrument to measure gravitation variations at two different places and nothing else and in fact it cannot tell you what exactly a gravity is". First of all we have to set our mind that open area is not free and there is strong EMF is present and it is influencing each and everything including functioning of atomic clocks.YoursPsreddy
bearing in mind that a more experienced mathematician could and would describe these graphs and plots as vectors in a far more eloquently expressed equation
Partial dirivitive definition: "A partial derivative of a function of several variables is its derivative with respect to one of those variables."
Partial dirivitives of a time dilation being directional 'up', 'down' variables of a singular function, of 1 of any 3 time phenomenon.Partial dirivitives of changes in acceleration (a), (b), & (c) being variables of a singular function of observed changes in acceleration.
But going back to page 6, this being my main concern, if you can find the time at some point Colin to help me properly formalise that R scale consideration with the appropriate mathematical notation, that would be really great.
@Colin2B I have read through the wikipedia article and I am unconvinced by MOND.