0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hopefully, this will be put right soon!
What counts in Science is factual evidence.
Until practical scientists like Galileo
Quote from: charles1948 on 09/06/2021 22:34:50What counts in Science is factual evidence.You seem to pick and choose what factual evidence to listen to. If you don't understand it, you blow it off. That's the argument from incredulity fallacy. Not at all a good scientific attitude to have.
But I don't believe some of them are true.
I understand the modern theories.
Specifically, the theory that the entire Universe originated from a single tiny particle seems absurd, and unscientific.. Where's the evidence for it?There isn't any. You might just as well claim that the Universe has always existed in a Steady State
Specifically, the theory that the entire Universe originated from a single tiny particle seems absurd, and unscientific.. Where's the evidence for it?
Thanks, when I referred to Galileo as a "practical scientist" I was thinking more of his telescopic observations of the Moon and Jupiter to refute Aristotle.
Where's the evidence for it?
You might just as well claim that the Universe has always existed in a Steady State
Quote from: charles1948 on 10/06/2021 00:45:41But I don't believe some of them are true.And the recurring theme on your part for that disbelief is the argument from incredulity..................That tells me you don't understand the theories as well as you think you do. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and give you a chance to prove yourself. Can you explain ito us what the Big Bang theory is, why it was proposed in the first place and why it is currently the most accepted theory for the origin of the Universe?
It's clear that the "Big Bang" theory is too firmly established to be challenged
they were misled by the Mathematicians.
Don't you think that modern "Physics" has been almost entirely captured by "Mathematicians"
Just like they did in earlier centuries, when they told astronomers that the Moon must revolve around the Earth in a mathematically perfect circle.
The mathematicians prevailed over the astronomers, and for 1500 years astronomers had to believe that all celestial movements are circular.
You really should find out how science works before you try to overturn it.
It's clear that the "Big Bang" theory is too firmly established to be challenged. At least, at present.This has often happened in Science. Established theories don't get overthrown, until all the scientists who've been seduced by them, die off. And are replaced by a new generation of young scientists, who exclaim in disbelief:"What! They believed in that! They thought the entire physical mass of the Universe, all the billions of stars in all the billions of galaxies, were once contained in a single mathematical point? Were they mad?"To which the answer is: No, the Scientists weren't mad - they were misled by the Mathematicians.
Can you explain to us what the Big Bang theory is, why it was proposed in the first place and why it is currently the most accepted theory for the origin of the Universe?
In due course, it will no doubt be replaced
Quote from: Kryptid on Yesterday at 01:05:16Can you explain to us what the Big Bang theory is, why it was proposed in the first place and why it is currently the most accepted theory for the origin of the Universe?