0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
And, we need the relationship between zipons and relativity phenomena./b]I hope to get there. But right now I'm going to have to marshall the resourses and take a break. jerryGG38's been quiet. I presume he's working. Thanks for the input thus far. I'll get back to you.This is such fun - for me anyway. Thanks again. []
Yes confined photons within a particular volume are mass. The only problem I have with the equation is that if the mass is moving at light speed, then how can it have additional momentum? If the speed of light is the limit, then moving a mass with linear momentum must reduce the orbital speeds.
If the speed of light is the limit, then moving a mass with linear momentum must reduce the orbital speeds.
Quote from: jerrygg38Yes confined photons within a particular volume are mass. The only problem I have with the equation is that if the mass is moving at light speed, then how can it have additional momentum? If the speed of light is the limit, then moving a mass with linear momentum must reduce the orbital speeds.There should be no problem. The photon does not have mass. I just say that it is mass. I suspect that mass is nothing more than electromagnetic change. The arithmetic works for that concept. Any time there is electric and magnetic amplitude change in a local area, you can compute the mass with established maths.Quote from: jerrygg38If the speed of light is the limit, then moving a mass with linear momentum must reduce the orbital speeds.Yes; this is called time dilation. Mass made of light must experience time dilation when it moves.
Answer No.2 I never thought of. Is it your original idea or standard Einsteinian?
Quote from: jerrygg38Answer No.2 I never thought of. Is it your original idea or standard Einsteinian?Not Einstein; but I suspect Maxwell originated the concept and it was developed by Poincare, Fitzgerald, and Lorentz. The result was the Lorentz transformations. I came up with the concept independently, but before I could celebrate, I discovered that the idea was very old.
H. Ziegler: If one thinks about the basic particles of matter as invisible little spheres which possess an invariable speed of light, then all interactions of matter like states and electrodynamic phenomena can be described and thus we would have erected the bridge between the material and immaterial world that Mr. Planck wanted.
This is the first mention I found of the concept. It comes from one of Einstein's articles. Development of Our Conception of theNature and Constitution of RadiationQuote from: the linkH. Ziegler: If one thinks about the basic particles of matter as invisible little spheres which possess an invariable speed of light, then all interactions of matter like states and electrodynamic phenomena can be described and thus we would have erected the bridge between the material and immaterial world that Mr. Planck wanted.
Regarding Sophiecentaur's criticisms - he's right. As a rule a trained mind is simply bored with an untrained. Of necessity I plod.Sophiecentaur. What must I say or do to stop your eternal attack. If you don't like me posting here then please check with the moderators. I'll get off this thread and this forum if it is required.
Now to the second part of that sum. One of those strings splits apart and unravels. It's catastrophic. The formation is lost and all the zipons in that string - simply tumble together in a massive nebulus. But as they do so all that latent energy - that velocity of 2c is expressed in two ways. Some of the zipons accelerate and lose volume - something less than 0.5. Some of the zipons decelerate and gain volume - something more than 0.5. But deceleration and acceleration is precisely proportionate to decrease and increase in mass - respectively.