0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The measured speed of light in a vacuum being the same in every frame disproves the logic of your suggestion. What moves the electrons and photon to be confounded in every frame? The answer to that will point you in the correct direction.
The directional path of light on the rotating Earth is c+v and c-v for a one way direction. The + and - cancel out when measuring the two way speed of light. This was proven with atomic clocks on airplanes one flying east and the other west.
Been exploring the concept in my head. Seems to me, many of us argue (within ourselves) about the need for a medium of space. Like myself, many suspect there must be a medium for light and/or gravity waves to propagate through space, but we cannot see it. We can neither prove, nor disprove such quality, it has no tangible quality, other than taking/making up space.The Michaleson Morely experiment (MME) is the most prominent example of the search for a definitive answer. But the experiment was limited to being performed at the surface of the earth.I postulate atomic structure (mass) displace aether.If that postulation is correct, I conclude that solid mass displace most aether, followed by liquids then gas. From the core of the earth to the outer most reaches of the atmosphere, it would be something of a sliding scale.I’ve been struggling to contrive a method to detect it, but I’m coming up blank.Even if there is such a quality, can we assume it doesn’t interact with mass/matter?Best I’ve got: Its everywhere there isn’t atoms, there is aether. If there is aether around the sun and we’re orbiting the sun within it… It stands to reason the aether would flow in a similar path around the sun, as the Earth.–That’s explains to me, why MME and others fail to detect any aether quality of space.
I don't believe there is a "static" aether. To my knowledge, it's been proven that simply does not exist.What hasn't been established nor dispelled is that a fluid like aether may exist. I've been struggling with the concept internally and have yet to concoct proof or denial.We apparently cannot detect such substance, its beyond our ability at present. It seems there is evidence that suggests there are characteristics of such substance that have affect on mass.
Been exploring the concept in my head. Seems to me, many of us argue (within ourselves) about the need for a medium of space. Like myself, many suspect there must be a medium for light and/or gravity waves to propagate through space, but we cannot see it. We can neither prove, nor disprove such quality, it has no tangible quality, other than taking/making up space. The Michaleson Morely experiment (MME) is the most prominent example of the search for a definitive answer. But the experiment was limited to being performed at the surface of the earth. I postulate atomic structure (mass) displace aether. If that postulation is correct, I conclude that solid mass displace most aether, followed by liquids then gas. From the core of the earth to the outer most reaches of the atmosphere, it would be something of a sliding scale. I’ve been struggling to contrive a method to detect it, but I’m coming up blank.Even if there is such a quality, can we assume it doesn’t interact with mass/matter? Best I’ve got: Its everywhere there isn’t atoms, there is aether. If there is aether around the sun and we’re orbiting the sun within it… It stands to reason the aether would flow in a similar path around the sun, as the Earth. That’s explains to me, why MME and others fail to detect any aether quality of space.