1
New Theories / Re: Jano's relativity denials
« Last post by Kryptid on Today at 00:11:12 »So what's your point?
Right, this is about the consistency in logic and staying with experimental results.Even if you choose another light wave.
How does the light inertial frame calculate time with the Lorentz transformation?
How did you answer your own question from the other thread?
From the jist of what was told to me, it appeared that no such frame existed.
when ζ(1-s)=0 → ζ(s)=0, ζ(s*)=0, ζ(1-s*)=0
The sum and difference among those terms must also equal 0
Let's focus on the imaginary part of the addition equation.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+im%28zeta%280.5%2Bis%29+%2B+zeta%280.5-is%29%29+from+0+to+30
And the real part of the subtraction equation.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+re%28zeta%280.5%2Bis%29+-+zeta%280.5-is%29%29+from+0+to+30
They are always zero.
Compare them to the value of s where the real part is slightly different from 0.5.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+im%28zeta%280.5001%2Bis%29+%2B+zeta%280.4999-is%29%29+from+0+to+30
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+re%28zeta%280.5001%2Bis%29+-+zeta%280.4999-is%29%29+from+0+to+30
Even if you choose another light wave.
How does the light inertial frame calculate time with the Lorentz transformation?
How did you answer your own question from the other thread?
Do you mane this?
c=λ.fAs observed.
Redshift reduces frequency. For c to be constant, wavelength must increase accordingly. Wavenumber must decrease accordingly.
Which is why you need quantum mechanics to explain superconductivity.Accelerating charges emit electromagnetic radiation.Not necessarily. Circulating current in a ring superconductor can stay for years with no perceivable decay.
Which phenomena are you referring to?Jumping and tunneling.