0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
To the poster BPQuote BP; Did we land on the Moon?NO “WE” did not, but a few good Astronauts did! Of course we landed on the Moon!
To the poster BPQuote BP; Did we land on the Moon?NO ?WE? did not, but a few good Astronauts did! Of course we landed on the Moon!Ed
Quote from: G-1 Theory on 19/07/2007 19:25:35To the poster BPQuote BP; Did we land on the Moon?NO ?WE? did not, but a few good Astronauts did! Of course we landed on the Moon!EdYou are right, Ed Astronauts landed on the Moon and returned samples that provided totally unexpected information on the Sun. I analyzed some of those Moon samples.
Someone asked before why NASA didn't point the hubble 'scope at the moon and take pictures of the debris left behind. Well, the answer is simple. The same peopel who claim the original fil is a fake would say the hubble images were a fake. In the same way I'm afraid that Om's contribution won't help. the claim will be something like "He's only saying that because he's paid to" or"He may have analysed some rocks but they were fakes." (of course the bit about the expected nature of the sun was a clever fake too- double bluff)For many questions and sources of information like these the matter is more one of theology than science. "Everything you say that proves the point is a fake" works perfectly- just like "proof denies faith".However, would someone please tell me who put the retroreflectors on the moon if nobody went there and how did they fake the radio signals that the Russians picked up? (Or roughly as difficult, how did they persuade the Russians to keep quiet?)
Did you do it before Apollo 14 mission's return?
Quote Did you do it before Apollo 14 mission's return? Good question, Lightarrow.I did not receive Moon samples until 1971, after becoming suspicious about a report that strange nuclear reactions in the Moon produced the light isotopes (atoms) of Krypton.Our analysis revealed mass separated isotopes of Krypton and other elements coming from the Sun, as shown here for Krypton and Xenon:www.omatumr.com/Data/1972Data1.htmIsotope data from samples returned by earlier missions showed the same mass separation of isotopes in material from the Sun. For example, isotope data from the 1969 Apollo 11 mission showed a common mass fractionation across the isotopes of Neon and Xenon:"Mass fractionation and isotope anomalies in Neon and Xenon," Nature 227 (1970) 1113-1116www.nature.com/nature/journal/v227/n5263/abs/2271113a0.html With kind regards,Oliverwww.omatumr.com
In all other cases than the genuine one, the RUSSIANS (who really wanted it to be a fake) would have spotted that anomaly and publicised it.Go on - answer that one.
If you don't believe the News and your Government, why should I believe You?
What actual evidence do you have that is more believable than theirs?
There's lots of evidence that they didn't go to the moon. Look at this.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1UEv2PIzl4 At the 2 minute 35 second mark of the video the flag is still. When the astronaut goes past it, it starts to move. There's an analysis of it here at the 3 minute 5 second mark. //www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC1legw5-gs