0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
A new theory also needs to make predictions that can be tested and hence lead to affirmation or falsification.
In terms of predictions and new claims, STEM provides plenty; which future research will ultimately prove or disprove. Let’s have a look at some:1. The existence of positive charge carriers within electrical conductors
3. Positrons generated by colliders and high-energy lasers are positive charge carriers that have been forcedly ejected from a metal by high-energy impact collision.
4. The only electron orbitals are those outer orbitals referred to as being conduction band orbitals.
5. The polygonal structure of the atomic nucleus dictates the bonding characteristics of atoms.
7. Light consists of field-energy rings (FERs) that explain the wave-particle nature of light.
What is meaningless and totally non-sensical is your statement that 'you can't prove that it's true or false'.
I do not know what experiments could possibly disprove the concepts.
STEM electron consists of a torus-shaped energy-core of concentrated energen, and an outer torus of less concentrated energen that is called field-energy.
There is no indication that there positive charge carriers in conductors. All experimentation indicates there are not positive charge carriers in conductors.
Quote from: Origin on 19/10/2022 13:02:26There is no indication that there positive charge carriers in conductors. All experimentation indicates there are not positive charge carriers in conductors.Beg to differ. That's how pn junctions work, and the reason that Hall coefficients can be positive or negative depending on the temperature and composition of alloys.But you are half right - holes are not positrons.
Beg to differ. That's how pn junctions work, and the reason that Hall coefficients can be positive or negative depending on the temperature and composition of alloys
We can change the nucleus- by isotopic substitution.if your ideas are correct then that will change the bonding characteristics of the atoms.But, in fact it has virtually no effect.So we know that your idea is, at best, on very shaky ground.On the other hand, things like thishttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSEPR_theory [nofollow]do a very good job of explaining the bonds in molecules without needing your angels dancing on pinheads
Allotropes, such as C-12 diamond and graphite, have a different nuclear structure
In terms of predictions and new claims, STEM provides plenty; which future research will ultimately prove or disprove. Let’s have a look at some:1. The existence of positive charge carriers within electrical conductorsThere is no indication that there positive charge carriers in conductors. All experimentation indicates there are not positive charge carriers in conductors. Quote from: Stemmer on 19/10/2022 11:25:433. Positrons generated by colliders and high-energy lasers are positive charge carriers that have been forcedly ejected from a metal by high-energy impact collision.Positrons are not positive charge carries in conductors. Positrons are anti-electrons and any positron in a conductor would encounter an electron and annihilate.Quote from: Stemmer on 19/10/2022 11:25:434. The only electron orbitals are those outer orbitals referred to as being conduction band orbitals.This is obviously wrong because atoms are electrically neutral which would not be the case if there was only electrons in the conduction band.Quote from: Stemmer on 19/10/2022 11:25:435. The polygonal structure of the atomic nucleus dictates the bonding characteristics of atoms.There is no indication that there is this type of structure in the nucleus, it is not possible according to QM.Quote from: Stemmer on 19/10/2022 11:25:437. Light consists of field-energy rings (FERs) that explain the wave-particle nature of light.Your made up term explains nothing.You have essentially falsified your WAG.You don't have a model, a theory or even a hypothesis. You have a WAG (guess).
Positrons are not positive charge carries in conductors. Positrons are anti-electrons and any positron in a conductor would encounter an electron and annihilate.
This is obviously wrong because atoms are electrically neutral which would not be the case if there was only electrons in the conduction band
There is no indication that there is this type of structure in the nucleus, it is not possible according to QM.
Light consists of field-energy rings (FERs) that explain the wave-particle nature of light. Your made up term explains nothing.
You have essentially falsified your WAG. You don't have a model, a theory or even a hypothesis. You have a WAG (guess).
Isotopes have the same nuclear structure
Allotropes, such as C-12 diamond and graphite, have a different nuclear structure and are thus not amenable to isotopic substitution.
So, unfortunately, no ; your supposition in no way disproves STEM.
A hypothesis is simply an intuitive or reasoned guess that needs to be able to explain something about its target subject, and can stand until it is disproven
Nearly 100% of natural phosphorus is the isotope phosphorus-31. It's the only stable isotope, as all of the others have half-lives ranging from a few weeks to a matter of nanoseconds. Despite this, many different allotropes of phosphorus are known (white, red, black and violet, for example). Red phosphorus can be produced by heating white phosphorus in the absence of oxygen. So that's an example of an easy conversion between two allotropes. That, of course, doesn't make the resulting red phosphorus radioactive. That would have been easily noticed if it was true.
Heavy water is water where the hydrogen isotope used is deuterium instead of the normal protium. Despite being a different isotope, it bonds in the same way as protium does (it can only form a single sigma bond). Ditto for tritium.
Biomolecules have one of their atoms replaced with a radioactive isotope of the same type so that the resulting radiation can be used to track where it goes in an organism. Obviously, the bonding can't be different or the resulting molecular structure would also be different
And, yes, phosphorous can change its crystal form (and thus have different allotropic forms) by the application of heat and pressure without changing its nuclear structure
Apropos holes, the problem with aluminum (which is most definitely a metallic conductor - it's used for power transmission) is that its Hall voltage at room temperature cannot be derived from a moving electron model.