0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
That's the same image you posted earlier. As I said before, it's far too simple and generic of a shape to say that it's supposed to be an extraterrestrial spacecraft.Seriously, you opened this thread with a picture you found on the Internet and made the statement that, "the probability of alien existence concluded from this drawing is P=1 which is 100%" when in fact it was a fake picture created by someone as a school project. Then you posted another fake picture (possibly two). You really need to reconsider how you go about doing research and coming to conclusions, because the way you're doing it now clearly isn't working.
Quote from: Kryptid on 30/10/2017 23:44:48That's the same image you posted earlier. As I said before, it's far too simple and generic of a shape to say that it's supposed to be an extraterrestrial spacecraft.Seriously, you opened this thread with a picture you found on the Internet and made the statement that, "the probability of alien existence concluded from this drawing is P=1 which is 100%" when in fact it was a fake picture created by someone as a school project. Then you posted another fake picture (possibly two). You really need to reconsider how you go about doing research and coming to conclusions, because the way you're doing it now clearly isn't working.I obviously did not know the pics were fake, had the pics being real then my logic would of been correct. I am wrong on this one admittedly.
Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 12:08:33Quote from: Kryptid on 30/10/2017 23:44:48That's the same image you posted earlier. As I said before, it's far too simple and generic of a shape to say that it's supposed to be an extraterrestrial spacecraft.Seriously, you opened this thread with a picture you found on the Internet and made the statement that, "the probability of alien existence concluded from this drawing is P=1 which is 100%" when in fact it was a fake picture created by someone as a school project. Then you posted another fake picture (possibly two). You really need to reconsider how you go about doing research and coming to conclusions, because the way you're doing it now clearly isn't working.I obviously did not know the pics were fake, had the pics being real then my logic would of been correct. I am wrong on this one admittedly. You didn't even bother trying to establish whether the picture was faked or not. I am not sure if you actually care or not though. For you it is all about getting attention isn't it? If just one person was credulous enough to think it was real, you would have been able to crow about how people agree with you. Hence your tenuous relationship with the truth.
You know you can't win right?
You know I will never give up until I reach my goal?
You know my hero of my story will always be smart enough to gain victory?
Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 14:38:59You know you can't win right? I guess that depends on what exactly he's trying to "win" here.QuoteYou know I will never give up until I reach my goal?Your goal being what, exactly? Proving the existence of aliens with pictures you found on the Internet?QuoteYou know my hero of my story will always be smart enough to gain victory?Is this another case of that "I can't be wrong" syndrome you mentioned in another thread? You're not humble enough to admit that, as a fallible human being, your conclusions could potentially be wrong?
Quote from: Kryptid on 31/10/2017 17:44:56Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 14:38:59You know you can't win right? I guess that depends on what exactly he's trying to "win" here.QuoteYou know I will never give up until I reach my goal?Your goal being what, exactly? Proving the existence of aliens with pictures you found on the Internet?QuoteYou know my hero of my story will always be smart enough to gain victory?Is this another case of that "I can't be wrong" syndrome you mentioned in another thread? You're not humble enough to admit that, as a fallible human being, your conclusions could potentially be wrong?Please do not bother speaking to me anymore, It is annoying you and your friend spoon keep trying to turn the threads into a soap and drama. I wish you good day and will no longer respond to troll behaviour.
Please do not bother speaking to me anymore, It is annoying you and your friend spoon keep trying to turn the threads into a soap and drama. I wish you good day and will no longer respond to troll behaviour.
Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 18:24:19Please do not bother speaking to me anymore, It is annoying you and your friend spoon keep trying to turn the threads into a soap and drama. I wish you good day and will no longer respond to troll behaviour. So what behavior would you consider to be a productive contribution to this thread?
Quote from: Kryptid on 31/10/2017 20:20:06Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 18:24:19Please do not bother speaking to me anymore, It is annoying you and your friend spoon keep trying to turn the threads into a soap and drama. I wish you good day and will no longer respond to troll behaviour. So what behavior would you consider to be a productive contribution to this thread?The thread was over when I admitted I was wrong about the pictures because you all showed me the pics are fake where the place I got them claimed they were ancient . My mistake which I accepted as my mistake. It is a shame science can't except their mistakes hey such as an object being at rest in an inertia reference frame is not at rest and so on.
Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 20:34:49Quote from: Kryptid on 31/10/2017 20:20:06Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 18:24:19Please do not bother speaking to me anymore, It is annoying you and your friend spoon keep trying to turn the threads into a soap and drama. I wish you good day and will no longer respond to troll behaviour. So what behavior would you consider to be a productive contribution to this thread?The thread was over when I admitted I was wrong about the pictures because you all showed me the pics are fake where the place I got them claimed they were ancient . My mistake which I accepted as my mistake. It is a shame science can't except their mistakes hey such as an object being at rest in an inertia reference frame is not at rest and so on. Science can accept its mistakes. Sadly you dont seem able to.
Quote from: The Spoon on 31/10/2017 20:42:09Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 20:34:49Quote from: Kryptid on 31/10/2017 20:20:06Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 18:24:19Please do not bother speaking to me anymore, It is annoying you and your friend spoon keep trying to turn the threads into a soap and drama. I wish you good day and will no longer respond to troll behaviour. So what behavior would you consider to be a productive contribution to this thread?The thread was over when I admitted I was wrong about the pictures because you all showed me the pics are fake where the place I got them claimed they were ancient . My mistake which I accepted as my mistake. It is a shame science can't except their mistakes hey such as an object being at rest in an inertia reference frame is not at rest and so on. Science can accept its mistakes. Sadly you dont seem able to. That would be contradictory to my already made admittance of the mistake in this thread. My mistake is replying to you and letting you troll me. However I have nothing else better to do and the Beta blocker prevent me from getting irate. The failure will be all yours. And like I said, science so far as not accepted their mistakes. They are wrong on several things but will never admit it.
No - sciences has progressed by admitting mistakes and learning from it. Just because nobody agrees with your misreading of science does not make science wrong. It is because you do not have even a basic grounding in the subject.
I am sorry to inform you but I have more intellect and thinking ability than you do . Therefore I am far more clever than you.
Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 20:57:52I am sorry to inform you but I have more intellect and thinking ability than you do . Therefore I am far more clever than you. And you know this, how?
No, I have shown science to be incorrect about several things
And these are? I'm certainly intrigued by this one
Quote from: atbsphotography on 31/10/2017 21:05:09And these are? I'm certainly intrigued by this oneWhere to start? Time dilation maybe or perhaps space expanding.
From what I can understand with regards to time dilation ( It isn't something I've actually looked into properly as of yet) It is right when it's said that when an object travelling at say 100mph would experience time in a different way to something that is at complete rest. So something travelling at the speed of light would most certainly experience time in a different way to something at a complete standstill.This is my thoughts on this like I have already said I've not looked deeper into it yet.
Quote from: atbsphotography on 31/10/2017 21:16:47From what I can understand with regards to time dilation ( It isn't something I've actually looked into properly as of yet) It is right when it's said that when an object travelling at say 100mph would experience time in a different way to something that is at complete rest. So something travelling at the speed of light would most certainly experience time in a different way to something at a complete standstill.This is my thoughts on this like I have already said I've not looked deeper into it yet.I will first explain time dilation in realism << (Realistic) terms. A person on the ground stationary counts time, a person in motion counts time slower than the person on the ground. Both of them experience a different rate of counting but both of them experience the same amount of time passed.
Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2017 21:22:41Quote from: atbsphotography on 31/10/2017 21:16:47From what I can understand with regards to time dilation ( It isn't something I've actually looked into properly as of yet) It is right when it's said that when an object travelling at say 100mph would experience time in a different way to something that is at complete rest. So something travelling at the speed of light would most certainly experience time in a different way to something at a complete standstill.This is my thoughts on this like I have already said I've not looked deeper into it yet.I will first explain time dilation in realism << (Realistic) terms. A person on the ground stationary counts time, a person in motion counts time slower than the person on the ground. Both of them experience a different rate of counting but both of them experience the same amount of time passed.Isn't it the other way round, if I was to simultaneously stand stationary and be in constant acceleration at 100 mph I'm sure I would count time slower standing still than I would at a 100mph. The logic for this is the faster you are going the faster you experience time and the slower you are, in this case, stationery, you would time slower. Even though no matter what speed you are accelerating or if you are stationary, time would still be constant and would remain unchanged.
According to special relativity, the rate of a clock is greatest according to an observer who is at rest with respect to the clock. In a frame of reference in which the clock is not at rest, the clock runs more slowly, as expressed by the Lorentz factor.