0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It's regular current
Your diagram, cross sections.jpg, shows why the voltage falls to zero twice per revolution.However, generators are known to work. So your assertion that the resultant current is always zero is obviously wrong.
Your comment shows that you haven't understood anything from what was written.
However, generators are known to work. So your assertion that the resultant current is always zero is obviously wrong.
Well, I'm really quite clever ...
However, you have admitted that there is an error in the explanation of the working principle of synchronous generators and motors.
The others should judge how clever you are.
The resultant current is zero.
A single conductor is rotating uniformly in a magnetic field as in the figure below. Can you fill the coordinate system on the right with the waveform of the induced current in the conductor? Please pay attention to the four moments marked with Roman numbers.
P.S. It is a well known experiment that when we move a magnet in or out of a solenoid, a current is produced in it. Instead of moving the magnet, we can move the solenoid towards or away from the magnet.Let’s imagine that the solenoid has a shape of a square. Look at the picture below:The square loop is moving up toward the magnet. Since both sides are moving upward, the current in the right side is away from us, while the current in the left side is toward us. However, if the right side is moving up and the left down (as in the example of the rotating loop), then in both little circles in the drawing above I have to draw the letter x.
Quote from: Mitko Gorgiev on 15/03/2020 12:57:46A single conductor is rotating uniformly in a magnetic field as in the figure below. Can you fill the coordinate system on the right with the waveform of the induced current in the conductor? Please pay attention to the four moments marked with Roman numbers.Using right hand rule, the current should be 0 at point II and IV. Maximum at point I (pointing out of screen). Minimum at point III (into the screen).
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 16/03/2020 10:26:55Quote from: Mitko Gorgiev on 15/03/2020 12:57:46A single conductor is rotating uniformly in a magnetic field as in the figure below. Can you fill the coordinate system on the right with the waveform of the induced current in the conductor? Please pay attention to the four moments marked with Roman numbers.Using right hand rule, the current should be 0 at point II and IV. Maximum at point I (pointing out of screen). Minimum at point III (into the screen).No, Hamdani. You are very, very wrong. Would you try again?
So, Mitko Gorgiev, would you like to explain why you think everybody in the world is wrong, and you are right?
(it doesn't matter whether I say "induced current" or "induced voltage", since both have the same waveform)
Do you believe that I do this out of fun - going against the whole world?
But I am deeply convinced that the truth is on my side and I do this solely for the sake of the truth.
I will soon explain in details what this graph means.
Through this loop will flow a current, but to the dashed line clockwise, above the dashed line counter-clockwise.Now the question arises: how come a current is induced in the loop, when there is no change in the magnetic flux during the movement of the loop?Moreover, why does the induced current change the direction at the dashed line in the middle?How can these things be explained from the contemporary electromagnetic theory?