61
General Science / Re: Can science alter the concept of money?
« on: 21/09/2017 12:08:49 »
Money is an inanimate object. We can run science experiments to investigate the properties of money. What you will find is money does nothing on its own, but will forever remain in the pile, where you placed it, having no impact on anything in the lab. We can check back weeks later and still the money has not done anything. It is like any other inanimate object in the lab.
In the second part of the experiment, we will place animals in the room with the money. Some of the animals may investigate the pile of money, but will see no value and soon leave it alone. Some of the animals may use it as bedding and nesting material and sit on it. But the money still does nothing. It is passive.
Next, we will place humans in the room near the pile of money. Again, with the money still doing nothing but staying in the pile, some of the humans will begin to project unconscious content into the money. This will appear to make the money come alive in their imagination. The scientists ruining the experiments will still see the money do nothing. The money, is like a work of art, stimulating the human imagination and emotions. But this is due to conditioned response that the animals did not show.
If we did away with money and culturally defined cheese or rocks for the same purpose as money, the same humans would animate that in their imagination. Your concern about money is really a concern about something in humans. The way you change the dynamics of money is to alter the unconsciousness in humans.
The main unconscious projection into money, is money can be a way to project self worth. Those who see the pile of money and start to project and imagine, will often see how that pile of inmate paper can make them worth more. Money is sort of like a woman's makeup, which can hide blemishes, and make her look prettier. However, a fool in his money is still a fool, even if he feels prettier and is pretty to shallow people who look no deeper.
Since a rich man can look pretty in the eyes of the shallow, but have no depth, he can make many mistakes acquiring and putting on his make up. This can impact the health of the earth.
In the second part of the experiment, we will place animals in the room with the money. Some of the animals may investigate the pile of money, but will see no value and soon leave it alone. Some of the animals may use it as bedding and nesting material and sit on it. But the money still does nothing. It is passive.
Next, we will place humans in the room near the pile of money. Again, with the money still doing nothing but staying in the pile, some of the humans will begin to project unconscious content into the money. This will appear to make the money come alive in their imagination. The scientists ruining the experiments will still see the money do nothing. The money, is like a work of art, stimulating the human imagination and emotions. But this is due to conditioned response that the animals did not show.
If we did away with money and culturally defined cheese or rocks for the same purpose as money, the same humans would animate that in their imagination. Your concern about money is really a concern about something in humans. The way you change the dynamics of money is to alter the unconsciousness in humans.
The main unconscious projection into money, is money can be a way to project self worth. Those who see the pile of money and start to project and imagine, will often see how that pile of inmate paper can make them worth more. Money is sort of like a woman's makeup, which can hide blemishes, and make her look prettier. However, a fool in his money is still a fool, even if he feels prettier and is pretty to shallow people who look no deeper.
Since a rich man can look pretty in the eyes of the shallow, but have no depth, he can make many mistakes acquiring and putting on his make up. This can impact the health of the earth.
The following users thanked this post: chris