0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Time is constant, it flows at a constant rate, to record time the recording also has to record at a constant rate. We are not using atomic camcorders, we are using standard camcorders.
Quote from: Thebox on 11/02/2016 11:58:49Time is constant, it flows at a constant rate, to record time the recording also has to record at a constant rate. We are not using atomic camcorders, we are using standard camcorders. Standard camcorders have electronic or crystal lock timing circuits to operate by otherwise they can not time a constant FPS rate. They are just another atomic clock. A timing device. The crystal vibrating at a set rate is divided down to give you your 24 exposures every second. If you went into the specs, it is quite likely that the timing accuracy is stated, in parts per trillion. Dependent on their own internal timing circuit.They are just another clock.So you predict that two timing mechanisms, properly calibrated running on exactly the same recording settings will take exactly the same observed time as observed by both frames of reference, even if one is accelerated to the almost the speed of light while recording. Is that my lesson? Now that to me from my limited knowledge is the Newtonian view of time.Is that what you want me to learn that time and therefore the Universe is Newtonian?
Quote from: Thebox on 11 February 2016, 22:32:20You measure time by various means, so how do you conceive that the rate of the clock affects what you are measuring?Thebox please just stop it. You have repeatably been told by a large number of people that it is only you that claims that this is what everyone else is saying. WE consistently write one thing and you consistently read another.That is not good communication skills.Now take out some paper and write 100 times;"Nobody conceives that the rate of the clock affects what is being measured".
Quote from: Thebox on 11 February 2016, 22:32:20I will stop it when you stop calling it a time dilation.?So it is clear as you just stated that you are intentionally and deliberately intending to misquote anything I say.I have tried to communicate with you mr Box.But this is it. No more communication attempts from me.It is one thing to be misunderstood for whatever reasons. When you make a statement like above, you declare yourself as a deliberate liar. I can not stand liars.Good bye.
Quote from: Space Flow on 11/02/2016 12:01:35Quote from: Thebox on 11 February 2016, 22:32:20You measure time by various means, so how do you conceive that the rate of the clock affects what you are measuring?Thebox please just stop it. You have repeatably been told by a large number of people that it is only you that claims that this is what everyone else is saying. WE consistently write one thing and you consistently read another.That is not good communication skills.Now take out some paper and write 100 times;"Nobody conceives that the rate of the clock affects what is being measured".Quote from: Space Flow on 11/02/2016 18:04:27Quote from: Thebox on 11 February 2016, 22:32:20I will stop it when you stop calling it a time dilation.?So it is clear as you just stated that you are intentionally and deliberately intending to misquote anything I say.I have tried to communicate with you mr Box.But this is it. No more communication attempts from me.It is one thing to be misunderstood for whatever reasons. When you make a statement like above, you declare yourself as a deliberate liar. I can not stand liars.Good bye.
Gave you all the info you needed did I?
Quote from: Thebox on 12/02/2016 10:00:15Gave you all the info you needed did I? You gave him more than enough to enable an accurate judgement.
You could never make an accurate judgement without seeing my hand expressions and gestures.
Quote from: Thebox on 12/02/2016 21:11:23You could never make an accurate judgement without seeing my hand expressions and gestures. Send us a video...............................