1
That CAN'T be true! / Were the Apollo moon landing photos faked?
« on: 27/05/2014 18:18:07 »
Hard science analysis of Apollo photos reveals they are not genuine.
Introduction here:
Oleyniks proof:
Solid 3D Proof That Apollo Photos Were Faked
http://criticalbelievers.proboards.com/thread/17565/solid-proof-apollo-photos-faked?page=1
A stereoscopic image or ‘wiggle’ stereoscopy. GIF-animation allows the creation of a crude sense of dimensionality, even with monocular vision. Stereoscopic imagery can also determine the relative position of objects in space and enable judgment of their remoteness. Image Wikipedia
Stereoscopic image of the Zmievskaya power plant allows one to measure the parallax and the distance to all remote objects.
Despite a slight offset of the camera, the mountains are moving, which contradicts the condition of distant mountains.
Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera.
Conclusion:
These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective.
Dr Oleg Oleynik
Introduction here:
Oleyniks proof:
Solid 3D Proof That Apollo Photos Were Faked
http://criticalbelievers.proboards.com/thread/17565/solid-proof-apollo-photos-faked?page=1
A stereoscopic image or ‘wiggle’ stereoscopy. GIF-animation allows the creation of a crude sense of dimensionality, even with monocular vision. Stereoscopic imagery can also determine the relative position of objects in space and enable judgment of their remoteness. Image Wikipedia
Stereoscopic image of the Zmievskaya power plant allows one to measure the parallax and the distance to all remote objects.
Despite a slight offset of the camera, the mountains are moving, which contradicts the condition of distant mountains.
Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera.
Conclusion:
These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective.
Dr Oleg Oleynik