1
New Theories / Re: Are gravitons really the leading theory on gravity?
« on: 18/06/2017 22:25:56 »
good evidence, in my mind, for the squeezing theory :
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
good evidence, in my mind, for the squeezing theory :
Ok, I have glanced at your link, but for clarity of your idea can you please summon up your idea in a single paragraph?
Mass is the generalised measurement of a bodies ''experience'' relative to other bodies?
(1) inertial mass - that which gives a body momentum, i.e. resists changes in motion
I do believe myself that anti-gravity exists. I feel the fundamental evidence lies within air. You and everyone else on the planet will consider this as buoyancy, however I believe when the E entropy of air changes, this has affect on the gravity mechanism within the atom, increasing or decreasing the gravity magnitude potential.
I also believe the earth does not fall into the sun because likewise polarities stop this from happening, a sort of cushioned dampening field between bodies. If you can consider something falling from the sky that had a field surrounding it, when the object falls through a likewise field , the object will slow down and my basis for this is simply magnetic suspension, the object ''floats'' on the field, the object is not buoyant it is being repulsed by equal field polarities.
That is a little bit of thought from me about the anti-gravitational properties of things like air that are ''buoyant''.
The real types of mass are
(1) inertial mass - that which gives a body momentum, i.e. resists changes in motion
(2) active gravitational mass - that which is the source of gravity
(3) passive gravitational mass - that on which gravity acts
Then on the other hand - there is the school of thought that a person will age in keeping with their time dilated clock as described in the NIST link above, and the link below.
Firstly, I feel it is important to not look at the attractive side of gravity, but to look at why things don't compress to a complete solid making everything dense.
I personally feel that charge stops total compression of matter because charge is opposed to charge.
What do you think?
I want a vote of who thinks gravitons are the leading theory or some other theory you can post here.