0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Is it reasonable to assume that the "particles" of wave particle duality exist in space time, and the waves exist outside space time in another dimension, manifesting them selves in space time as particles.
Quote from: disinterested on Today at 11:14:21Is it reasonable to assume that the "particles" of wave particle duality exist in space time, and the waves exist outside space time in another dimension, manifesting them selves in space time as particles.Anything that can age/decay/dissipate is space-time that exists in the now.
Quote from: Thebox on 15/06/2018 11:33:23Quote from: disinterested on Today at 11:14:21Is it reasonable to assume that the "particles" of wave particle duality exist in space time, and the waves exist outside space time in another dimension, manifesting them selves in space time as particles.Anything that can age/decay/dissipate is space-time that exists in the now.You miss the point of the question, does anyone else have a clue.
Could you explain the question another way ?Perhaps people do not understand your question, obviously I didn't understand it so you can assume other people may not understand it as well.
Quote from: Thebox on 15/06/2018 11:58:54Could you explain the question another way ?Perhaps people do not understand your question, obviously I didn't understand it so you can assume other people may not understand it as well.I thought it was a simple question, but as one last shot.The waves of wave particle duality are not actually measured they are inferred to exist from the way particles behave in space time, which could be viewed as flatland to a wave in a higher dimension. The double slit experiment is explained via wave particle duality and the wave can exist at all points in space at the same time. Looking at the various string theories of which there are many, various types of membranes MAY exists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane see p branes as an example.ER and EPR bridges exist outside space time, can wave particle duality be used as evidence that a higher dimension exists connecting all points in space both mathematically and by experiment in the double slit for instance.I strongly suspect I am not going to get coherent answers, but what the hell its poets day.
I strongly suspect I am not going to get coherent answers, but what the hell its poets day.
Quote from: disinterested on 15/06/2018 12:23:12I strongly suspect I am not going to get coherent answers, but what the hell its poets day.I might as well talk to myself You did not expect a coherent answer, and you are not going to get one so just stop posting questions you fool. Gone to the pub
Waves clearly exist in the 4 dimensions of spacetime
Probably not.Waves clearly exist in the 4 dimensions of spacetime and even sound waves are capable of particle behaviour ie transfer of momentum. The clue is more likely in how we measure and detect photons.
By the way, we don’t mind you asking questions like this in the main section, but introducing extra dimentions into a number of topics as the answer to every question either hints at a fixation or an attempt to introduce a new theory into the physics section.
what is space
Many people are theorizing about extra dimensions in space, some of it is complete crap or pop science, some of it is not and may actually be plausible. Space may not have existed in the form we view it today. Prior to any big bangs, it may have evolved from something else, or the space the expansion of space started from may still exist alongside our flatland space time.
Sound waves have little to do with EM waves other than the word wave.
I have no problem with the existence of additional dimensions, I just don’t see them as an answer to everything. Many things have very plausible explanation within 4D spacetime.
I’ll bow out then and leave you to the sentient members of our forum
gravity > ER Bridge > dark energy.