0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This is becoming tedious. Yes, any photons emitted near the event horizon will be experiencing blueshift. If, in the incredibly unlikely event that they bounce off all the right background particles, in the right order, and probability allows them the (very, very) unlikely opportunity to escape the black hole's gravity sufficiently to allow them to become redshifted, they will be redshifted.
The size of the black hole is irrelevant. I think I've basically pointed this out already.
Prior to that point, they are giving off gamma radiation, all the time
will be subject to huge gravitational forces and, hence, blueshifting.
For a black hole of solar mass (1033 g) this temperature is much lower than the 3 °K temperature of the cosmic microwave background.
As they got smaller, they would get hotter and so would radiate faster. As the temperature rose, it would exceed the rest mass of particles such as the electron and the muon and the black hole would begin to emit them also. When the temperature got up to about 1012 °K or when the mass got down to about 1014 g the number of different species of particles being emitted might be so great [11] that the black hole radiated away all its remaining rest mass on a strong interaction time scale of the order of 10-23 s. This would produce an explosion with an energy of 1035 ergs. Even if the number of species of particle emitted did not increase very much, the black hole would radiate away all its mass in the order of 10-28M3 s. In the last tenth of a second the energy released would be of the order of 1030 ergs.
We are going round in circles. Please review this thread and reflect on how I've addressed these issues in the previous posts.
I already have.
we can reasonably infer that their gravitational fields are composed of electrons.
if anything like a QGP forms the outer layer of a black hole (i.e. something that's positively charged)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05637#:~:text=Evaporating%20Primordial%20Black%20Holes%20in%20Gamma%20Ray%20and%20Neutrino%20Telescopes,-Antonio%20Capanema%2C%20AmirFarzan&text=A%20primordial%20black%20hole%20in,gamma%20ray%20and%20neutrino%20telescopes.http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/17588/1/Einstein%27s%20redshift%20derivations%20-%20preprint.pdfhttps://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1968Obs....88...91Shttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift
"Gravitational fields are not made of electrons." unjustified assertion. In terms of neutron star physics, it's highly unlikely they could be made of anything else. Their core is a bloody atomic nucleus (in essence) dude, think!
Also, I enjoy how you're distracting yourself with this quibbling over Hawking radiation and not addressing my point on dark energy (which was the original topic I was, here, intending to discuss). Nothing about the Casimir force also. Interesting.
Oh, what, you think I haven't studied general relativity?
The problem with you people is that you believe that every theory in physics is 100% true.
hence we have quantum gravity theories.
This is GR dogmatism.
However, gravitational fields are, I suspect, electron densities.
Having said that, you're just asserting that this idea of mine isn't compatible with relativity, you're not even giving an explanation as to why it isn't.