The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
The ontology of formal logic as it refers to what is logical actually.
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
The ontology of formal logic as it refers to what is logical actually.
0 Replies
1893 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Arcades Cinza
(OP)
First timers
3
Activity:
0%
Naked Science Forum Newbie
The ontology of formal logic as it refers to what is logical actually.
«
on:
12/09/2020 04:25:34 »
Domain:
To observe an aspect of reality requires an equality proxy to be assumed by the observer.
A real determination cannot be made, as the observer is always involved, and the spatial, nonspatial, and thus compositional location of the interaction is finitely internally domained, meaning that the domain specificity that allows the interaction, is determined by observation, and not the domain itself. The domain itself is shown to unitarily include both the observer and the object, a separation for which only the observer accounts. Literally, the domain is non-reducible, as you cannot rationally structure an internal basis for the domain's universality from the determined actualities of units of the domain- like an observer is in reality.
Basically, if there are things to observe, then things observed are not objective forms in themselves, but are ultimately apparencies with infinite compositional latitude...
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...