0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ah. I see. That's your problem... it's not actually a problem at all.What you're missing about the earth and the moon is that the moon can be considered as being in orbit about the sun (the moon is, after all, going around the sun once per year in much the same way as the earth is), but because the earth and the moon are close together, the moon's trajectory around the sun is disturbed by its trajectory around the earth. The earth's trajectory is also disturbed by the moon, but its a smaller wobble because the earth's mass is so much more than the moon's.
"What would be the results if we use plastic balls of same density instead of lead balls? Results should be the same if the gravity exists."No plastic is as dense as lead so that's impossible.[/quotThen it is clear, the force is dependent of densityAm i right?
I am still waiting for your answer on other point that I have mentioned against gravity in my theory
According to Gravitational Law, the force is inversely proportional to the distance. In case of Sun, Moon and Earth, the distance between Earth, Moon and Sun is constant but it varies in case of Sun and Moon.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/11/2010 12:56:11"What would be the results if we use plastic balls of same density instead of lead balls? Results should be the same if the gravity exists."No plastic is as dense as lead so that's impossible.Then it is clear, the force is dependent of densityAm i right?
"What would be the results if we use plastic balls of same density instead of lead balls? Results should be the same if the gravity exists."No plastic is as dense as lead so that's impossible.
Then it is clear, the force is dependent on density
Then it is clear, the force is independent of density
Go away and do your homework, make an effort to actually understand the current theory, and then maybe (if you still persist in "disagreeing with" gravity, which I doubt) you'll have something interesting to contribute.