1
New Theories / Re: is reality mathematical?
« on: 07/11/2018 08:51:17 »Looks like this, Thanksscience is stupidity
I'm afraid you're on the wrong website then.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Looks like this, Thanksscience is stupidity
I'm afraid you're on the wrong website then.
science is stupidity waste of time delusions on mentally ill scientists' mindsAshes for those who love science and spent their whole life on it although it was very hard work realizing that what they love is interpreted as a psychological disease with delusions called theories for those learners who left real enjoyment of life sex and spend their lives in misery.
What are you even talking about?
Thanks,It wasn't an insult.This is a science forum so please don't post any of your own personal insults.
Ashes for those who love science and spent their whole life on it although it was very hard work realizing that what they love is interpreted as a psychological disease with delusions called theories for those learners who left real enjoyment of life sex and spend their lives in misery.
If you think that makes sense you should probably be seeking professional help.
Thanks,
This is a science forum so please don't post any of your own personal insults.
Ashes for those who love science and spent their whole life on it although it was very hard work realizing that what they love is interpreted as a psychological disease with delusions called theories for those learners who left real enjoyment of life sex and spend their lives in misery.
If you think that makes sense you should probably be seeking professional help.
Ashes for those who love science and spent their whole life on it although it was very hard work realizing that what they love is interpreted as a psychological disease with delusions called theories for those learners who left real enjoyment of life sex and spend their lives in misery.Indeed it isn't but that doesn't make it.....
Make it... what?
Science is not about random guesses.Indeed it isn't but that doesn't make it.....
Why do you not consider physics to be a science?science is useless knowledge is what the reality is science is this could be like this and later it would be another thing.
You're playing with terms I think.playing with terms? aha what is playing with terms? term one plays with term 2 stupidity
"physics is knowledge but not science" sounds pretty questionable.
a waves ''characteristics'' are flowing energy.A wave occur in continuous field , however photons are discrete
Hi, all kinds of EM waves including visible light.Why not light to be consisted of electromagnetic waves and particles represented by photons If it has characteristics of both a wave and a particle?Hello, are you referring to visible light or the '''light'' that traverses through the space between objects?
Each part of light gives observations for its own characteristics.
That to be said when light is emitted from a source there should be a photons emission as well as electromagnetic waves emission from the same source.And both travel with the same speed of light.
And there is a relation between Electromagnetic wave frequency and photon energy the more frequency the more photon energy making photon and waves a unified collection, but the two are separate entities so that we can apply Maxwell's equations and quantum mechanics equations separately.
Earrings have permanent holes in the ear and doesn't need to make new hole each time........And several watts from riding a bicycle .But that does not involve a risky and unpleasant process of putting implants inside one's body.Quote from: YahaI will never extract a milliwatt from my body using an implantBut maybe you are already extracting microWatts with external devices like a self-winding watch, a pedometer, a fitness monitor or smartphone accelerometer?
And if you have ever used a sleeping bag, you have extracted tens of Watts from your sleeping body - for your own comfort!
You already have earrings.
And if you are asked to put implants it would be to save your life.
If the two are one thing how does a neutrally charged photon gives electric properties to the EM waves?Photon is neutrally charged.Nobody said (or implied) that it isn't.
Photon is neutrally charged.Why not light to be consisted of electromagnetic waves and particles represented by photons If it has characteristics of both a wave and a particle?You can think of the photon as being both a wave and a particle, traveling as a wave with its energy instantly absorbed on contact just like a particle.
Each part of light gives observations for its own characteristics.
That to be said when light is emitted from a source there should be a photons emission as well as electromagnetic waves emission from the same source.And both travel with the same speed of light.
And there is a relation between Electromagnetic wave frequency and photon energy the more frequency the more photon energy making photon and waves a unified collection, but the two are separate entities so that we can apply Maxwell's equations and quantum mechanics equations separately.
I meant if we thought of light as particles the part of light"photons" gives the idea light is particles , and if we thought of light as electromagnetic waves , the part of light"waves" gives the idea that light is electromagnetic waves.Each part of light gives observations for its own characteristics.That idea doesn't work.
If I shine a beam of light through a diffraction grating it all gets split into diffracted beams- so it must all have wave properties.