1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 10:32:08 »
We're on the edge of an abyss, and we have no idea of how it all will interact. We're learning more of it with each day passing though.
3
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 10:29:16 »
Then you have damming, something that will grow as panic sets in.
4
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 10:28:16 »
All with me assuming that you will behave as usual humanity.
What makes it so failed.
What makes it so failed.
5
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 10:25:21 »
2016 https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/earth-science/why-a-half-degree-temperature-rise-is-a-big-deal/
and a already failed one, not counting in such things as changing night temperature effects on crops
and a already failed one, not counting in such things as changing night temperature effects on crops
6
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 10:20:20 »
If you look at this one predictions seems to fail at anything above 2 degrees Celsius. they are best guesses of course, based on educated guesses, each study used more or less isolated from the other, and probably a lot more conservative that what those born today, will meet.
https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/impacts-climate-change-one-point-five-degrees-two-degrees/
https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/impacts-climate-change-one-point-five-degrees-two-degrees/
7
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 10:13:44 »
So my prediction should be the same as always, around 2.7 Celsius, and up, and that means that those born today will live, or not live, in such an environment. Because wars will grow, and so will the blame games. Internally as with USA, and externally. I don't give them that good a chance to see it actually, not the way we behave.
spelling
spelling
8
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 10:10:15 »
Me, I don't see we needed this one Stanford.
https://news.stanford.edu/2023/01/30/ai-predicts-global-warming-will-exceed-1-5-degrees-2030s/
Not for predicting that
https://news.stanford.edu/2023/01/30/ai-predicts-global-warming-will-exceed-1-5-degrees-2030s/
Not for predicting that
10
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 09:57:22 »
Of course, Copernicus will have to axle a even wider responsibility of reporting, but there we should find another type of self censuring, not as openly blatant as in USA, but just as effective. In the end it it should come down to those not aligned with political interests sieving through the data to then present independent conclusions
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/26/trump-presidency-gut-noaa-weather-climate-crisis
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/26/trump-presidency-gut-noaa-weather-climate-crisis
11
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Today at 09:51:30 »
Sure George, but 'overseas'? Are you implying that if those private ownerships would have been solely British it would have been different? If so, can you prove it?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/26/england-water-companies-shareholders-dividends-river-sea
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/26/england-water-companies-shareholders-dividends-river-sea
12
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 21:41:35 »
and it doesn't really matter if you accept my ideas or not. Both will give you a harder life. The only difference being our future, to have one, or not.
13
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 21:33:31 »
Those floods they have had recently should make it happen even faster, as topsoil gets flushed into rivers, out to the ocean.
14
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 21:31:56 »
What I meant, about it being the opposite? Well, how about making the desert 'bloom', although in this case, able to be farmed.
Backing off, slowing down and ban is something that could work, but over a longer time scale. Using up our groundwater for a short time solution won't. Saudi Arabia is our shining star there, trying it, just to suffocate most or maybe all ? oasis's they had. Don't know how many that still exist there now.
what it means for China is a worse living standard, where ours won't fare any better, as water, groundwater and topsoil disappear.
Backing off, slowing down and ban is something that could work, but over a longer time scale. Using up our groundwater for a short time solution won't. Saudi Arabia is our shining star there, trying it, just to suffocate most or maybe all ? oasis's they had. Don't know how many that still exist there now.
what it means for China is a worse living standard, where ours won't fare any better, as water, groundwater and topsoil disappear.
15
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 21:19:01 »
Won't happen, it will be the opposite, no matter if you accept my suggestions, or not.
Not only for China
Not only for China
16
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 21:17:00 »
How about this
" A national-scale model of China is developed to assess the groundwater depletion.
=
Total depletion averages around 16.7 km3/yr, equivalent to 30% of Yellow River's annual flow.
=
Model confirms the dichotomy between northern and southern China groundwater resources.
=
Depletion traces the Chinese economic development with implications for global sustainability. "
=
Groundwater, farming, and oasis's. With a promise from their elite, that China will gain our Western 'living standards'
forget it
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737822000360
" A national-scale model of China is developed to assess the groundwater depletion.
=
Total depletion averages around 16.7 km3/yr, equivalent to 30% of Yellow River's annual flow.
=
Model confirms the dichotomy between northern and southern China groundwater resources.
=
Depletion traces the Chinese economic development with implications for global sustainability. "
=
Groundwater, farming, and oasis's. With a promise from their elite, that China will gain our Western 'living standards'
forget it
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737822000360
17
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 21:13:24 »
Did you know, that China has the world fastest growing oasis?
" The researchers found that global oasis area increased by 220,800 square kilometers (85,251 square miles) over the 25-year timeframe. Most of that increase was from humans intentionally converting desert land into oases using runoff water and groundwater pumping, creating grasslands and croplands. The increase was concentrated in China, where management efforts have contributed more than 60% of the growth, Gui said. For example, more than 95% of the population in China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region lives within an oasis, motivating conservation and a 16,700 square kilometer (6,448 square mile) expansion of the oasis, Gui said. "
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240422170808.htm
sounds good?
" The researchers found that global oasis area increased by 220,800 square kilometers (85,251 square miles) over the 25-year timeframe. Most of that increase was from humans intentionally converting desert land into oases using runoff water and groundwater pumping, creating grasslands and croplands. The increase was concentrated in China, where management efforts have contributed more than 60% of the growth, Gui said. For example, more than 95% of the population in China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region lives within an oasis, motivating conservation and a 16,700 square kilometer (6,448 square mile) expansion of the oasis, Gui said. "
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240422170808.htm
sounds good?
18
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 20:55:51 »
But the rest aren't any worse, sort of?
To read I mean, well, some might be worse but you get it as a package, in real time, interacting
To read I mean, well, some might be worse but you get it as a package, in real time, interacting
19
New Theories / e: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 20:53:39 »
I think I will pick this one
Cop28, and soon 29. Natural gas and 'CCS' aka Carbon capture and storage.
"geoengineering's" unfolding
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240424182458.htm
Cop28, and soon 29. Natural gas and 'CCS' aka Carbon capture and storage.
"geoengineering's" unfolding
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240424182458.htm
20
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 20:44:49 »
As for the catastrophe we call climate?
Pick your piece https://www.sciencedaily.com/news/earth_climate/climate/
I mean, obvious enough even for a idiot, well, assuming able to read?
Pick your piece https://www.sciencedaily.com/news/earth_climate/climate/
I mean, obvious enough even for a idiot, well, assuming able to read?