121
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does the subjective ''visual'' experience throw difficulties on time dilation?
« on: 22/06/2016 01:35:11 »Hello, I have just returned after my Ban, elsewhere I learnt two words , objective and subjective.
And gosh do I regret that. You now throw those words into sentences like salt onto food.
Quote
For several years I have told science they are wrong and they have told me I am wrong, however I was mostly talking about the subjective experience rather than your objective thoughts. In fact what I was talking about when thinking about the subjective was correct even though I was told it was wrong, but never mind I have become ''enlightened'' and now understand the science objective thinking.
Where you go wrong here, is that you think subjective experience proves objective reality.
For example, nobody can argue against you if you find "blue" makes you feel happy and "green" makes you sad. That's your subjective experience.
But, while we may need to look at things to measure them, that's not subjective, because it's repeatable common experience - as close to "reality" as we can get. For example, you can take a paint-chip card from a home decorator shop and find that most (non colour-blind) people will (however they subjectively experience, or feel about colour) agree that a cloudless day is "blue" and grass is "green". We can also build devices to measure colour, which will get consistent results from these things. We can even shine white light through a prism and reliably and repeatably generate these things we call "blue" and "green".
So I don't deny your internal representation of how you perceive distance; this "gin clear" thing of yours - but when you try to use that subjective experience of yours to deny or re-wind thousands of years of scientific progress, I certainly say you are wrong.
Quote
However, in consideration of time dilation and all experiments that prove time dilation, all these objective thoughts and experiments are view through the subjective constant visual of ''gin-clear'' space, I feel regardless of what happens in the experiment and objective thought, the constant subjective ''visual'' remains constant and sheds some doubt to the authenticity of a time dilation.
Your feeling does not show the actual experiments performed by scientists to be wrong. For example, the experiments that show light speed to be finite; proving your 'subjective constant visual of ''gin-clear'' space' to not be applicable to reality.
Quote
For example the objective analogies of things like v shaped path laser beams to show time dilation, are subjectively none existence as we do not ''see'' laser beams naturally in space without a medium.
Seeing the beam in transit has nothing to do with the path the beam is known to take.
Quote
Also subjectively and evidently a laser beam does not subjectively have a reflective beam of a brick wall unless there is a mirror re-directing the beam.
What?
Quote
What do you think?
You remain wrong.