0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In what way do they "promote" 12 digits?For example, some of the fundamental ones are only defined to 9 or 10 digits9 192 631 770 Hz, which is 9.192631770 x 10^9 can be written as 9.192631770 x (√10)^18 which still is 9.192631770 x 10^9 and 2.99792458 x 10^8 can be written as easily as 2.99792458x(√10)^16 and gives the same results 299 792 458 m/sSome don't even make 6 digits 6.674 30 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2
In what way do they "promote" 12 digits?Your prejudice let you focus on one thing and your narrow mind studied only on your one tree of numerology and didn't allow you to see the forest of the paper. It was not written to replace the universal constants but to show the nuances, patterns and interconnectivity that all the constants have.for instance the permeability of space, 4π x 10^-7 can be written as 4π x (√10)^-14,The ratio of the proton to electron is 6π^5 and the ratio of the neutron to electron is 2.5 + 6π^5If you had bother t read the paper you would have seen the questions I posed at the end of it.The only real numerology that took place was to make α on the left side of this equation, α = π^(.02/α) x B^-7, equal α the right side of the equation. All of the other constants fell into place using the CODATA and NIST bulletins when I used this version of α.You were so prejudiced and focus on your own little tree of numerology you missed everything else.Don't bother to comment because I already know what you are going to say because you have already said it.
and can be written as 6.67430 x (√10)^-22 which gives 6.674300008 x 10^-11
changes from Newtons to dynes or Joules to ergs
Are you really saying thatx^n = √x ^ 2n is new and important (rather than a statement of the mathematically obvious)?Quote from: Franklin Nolle Williams on Today at 08:57:26and can be written as 6.67430 x (√10)^-22 which gives 6.674300008 x 10^-11Quote from: Franklin Nolle Williams on Today at 08:57:26changes from Newtons to dynes or Joules to ergsIf you just use one set of consistent units you don't need to do that.Why did you do it the hard way?
And you did it the hard way because...?
by changing the B exponent
does this have anything to do with the E^8 shape? If you do not understand go to howstuffworks/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/theory-of-everything