0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
One is reminded here of the problem of protein folding. As I have pointed out elsewhere (Watterson, 1997), that problem also arises from applying classical theories, since they predict an average, not a unique fold. That these questions remain unsolved still today after 50 years of intense research effort, highlights a two-fold failing of statistical methods: firstly, they did not predict the existence of a stable folded state, and secondly, once given as an experimental fact, they cannot explain it.
One example is connected to the statistical assumptions of classical biology as applied to life. It has been known for some time that proteins are bound together with very weak binding forces and can be easily denatured. Proteins are held together with the binding strength equivalence of a few hydrogen bonds. Due to these weak binding forces and the thermal energy in water, classical statistical assumption assume proteins should fold with average folds, governed by statistics. Over 50 years ago, it was observed that proteins actually fold with exact folds not governed by statistics; probability=1.0. QuoteOne is reminded here of the problem of protein folding. As I have pointed out elsewhere (Watterson, 1997), that problem also arises from applying classical theories, since they predict an average, not a unique fold. That these questions remain unsolved still today after 50 years of intense research effort, highlights a two-fold failing of statistical methods: firstly, they did not predict the existence of a stable folded state, and secondly, once given as an experimental fact, they cannot explain it.The dogma of statistics is so blindly followed and taught in biology, science has been willing to ignore hard reality for over 50 years. One only has consider how many students have been indoctrinated with science misinformation, due to the blind faith in a god of casinos. In this religion, one worships with black boxes and blind folds, to appease a god of chaos and gambling, using math oracles. This religion is old and dates back to before the age of enlightenment. On the other hand, this religion may not be entirely based on blind religious faith. It may also have a medical explanation. Gambling is very addictive. Any religion of jackpots and lotteries may be very hard to give up, due to the compulsive behavior associated with gambling. If you had a religion centered on alcohol or drugs, the drug addiction itself will make it hard for reason to get through the compulsive actions; physiological faith. In US, there is a separation of church and state, so maybe the government needs to be consistent and not support any faith based science. It may be healthy for the addiction to confront itself, so it can sober up to get back in graces; tough love.
I write books and produce both religious theories and scientific theories. Religions are theories of God and the Universe that comes from the inner minds of the various prophets. They use logic and reason to produce followers. Later they use force to insure obedience to their beliefs. Scientific theories come from the inner minds of the various scientific prophets. They use logic and reason and attempt to relate their beliefs with actual measurements. In general no force is used but over time they become part of the belief system of their followers. Then it becomes like religious dogma.
Einsteinism is a science cult & has given us a worldwide science-mafia that controls mainstream funding universities magazines institutions & research -- non-conforming scientists are squeezed out, lose their jobs, lose their funding, lose access to publishing in mainstream magazines. But the Einsteinian dark age will soon end, & aether will regain its rightful place, its power & its glory, for ever & ever. Amen.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 16/10/2018 02:51:55Einsteinism is a science cult & has given us a worldwide science-mafia that controls mainstream funding universities magazines institutions & research -- non-conforming scientists are squeezed out, lose their jobs, lose their funding, lose access to publishing in mainstream magazines. But the Einsteinian dark age will soon end, & aether will regain its rightful place, its power & its glory, for ever & ever. Amen.Hello Mad, are you educated in science ?
at present my main interest is aether (which requires that i try to understand the enemy (Einstein)).
Quote from: mad aetherist on 16/10/2018 11:16:03at present my main interest is aether (which requires that i try to understand the enemy (Einstein)).Thank you for explaining your background to me which helps me to give a simple explanation. Einstein is not your ''enemy'', Einstein explains the ''aether'' with space-time, which in essence is relational to a field space within a BH. Large mass objects can curve/bend space-time which is explained in the rubber sheet analogy. //www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTY1Kje0yLgIn your own mind , just replace the rubber sheet with ''invisible'' space-time. I hope this helps you understand.
Yousuf Godir asked the Naked Scientists: Do we understand that some scientific phenomenon became a religion dogma for scientist, and hence rationality fades away? For example, Big Bang, gravitation, and heliocentric seem to me not holding their feet on the ground, yet scientist consider it immune. Do you think these theories have strong base?What do you think?
Spacetime in no way explains aether. Spacetime itself, besides being a silly notion (within a stupid theory),
Quote from: mad aetherist on 16/10/2018 02:51:55Einsteinism is a science cult & has given us a worldwide science-mafia that controls mainstream funding universities magazines institutions & research -- non-conforming scientists are squeezed out, lose their jobs, lose their funding, lose access to publishing in mainstream magazines. But the Einsteinian dark age will soon end, & aether will regain its rightful place, its power & its glory, for ever & ever. Amen.IMO, Einstein was also a victim of your so called "a worldwide science-mafia that controls mainstream funding universities magazines institutions & research".Einstein actually advocated the existence of a physical aether, but he later capitulated under peer pressure, which turned his work into a cult science, and also twisted and turned the works of your aether heroes.This article on "The UVS review on the GR concepts of gravity", is my collective views on Einstein actually was an advocate for the existence of a physical aether. Like yourself, I also hope the dark age will soon end, & aether will regain its rightful place, its power & its glory, for ever & ever. But, let's set the target on the real culprits.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 16/10/2018 13:20:58Spacetime in no way explains aether. Spacetime itself, besides being a silly notion (within a stupid theory),I have spent over a decade saying the same sort of thing, it took me that long to fully understand Albert Einstein and space-time. I will be blunt and tell you that you are incorrect and are imagining that you know better than the genius of Albert Einstein. ( I use to do the same thing!) I will make a suggestion to you , spend lots of time trying to understand space-time, put space-time into your own words.Then you may understand..
I have to say that there is not the slightest chance of me believing any of SR & GR. They are so silly.
have to say that there is not the slightest chance of me believing any of SR & GR. They are so silly.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 17/10/2018 13:17:40have to say that there is not the slightest chance of me believing any of SR & GR. They are so silly.You seem like you have intelligence so must understand the difference in complete and incomplete education of a subject!Perhaps you do not know enough of the information to understand it fully, is that a possibility?Is there anything particular you would like to discuss ?