The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Mike and timey "Equivalancy in Relativity"
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Mike and timey "Equivalancy in Relativity"
0 Replies
1765 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
GoC
(OP)
Hero Member
903
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 82 times
Mike and timey "Equivalancy in Relativity"
«
on:
05/03/2017 13:52:07 »
Mike
Timey has allot of correct ideas but her format is wrong. her temporal idea of time being the cause of gravity is incorrect. Time is a measure of the ratio between Pe and Ke of a frame. You cannot say the measurement of gravity is the cause of gravity. First you have to consider what is being dilated in GR. That would be energy c as total energy available. While c is a constant (of total energy available) mass creates an affect on the energy state by dilation of energy changing the Pe density state of the spectrum causing gravity from the single atom to the galaxies.
Equivalency is in the photon to electron ratio.
1. GR dilation changes the electron travel distance through space. Mass expands and contracts based on the amount of mass and the position of that mass in relation to the other mass. The dilation is greatest in the center of mass where the electron travel distance is the greatest. When we measure the tick rate in the center of mass using the electron cycle the measurement duration between ticks increase and reaction rate of that frame slows. Mass is attracted to the expanded energy state because dilation of mass creates less friction with energy. So the Pe in the center of mass becomes less due to dilation of energy. If you are in the center of a planet and move towards the surface the Pe increases and the Ke decreases relative to total c energy.
2. SR vector speed the electron is traveling through space and cycling at the same time. Total c divides its energy between cycle time and vector motion. The division is between Ke vector speed and Pe total available motion.
The equivalency between GR and SR is in the temporal measurement of a frames clock. Clocks are only a measurement of Pe available.
The equivalency between SR and GR is in the cycle time of the electron in the form of energy available as c (represented as a Photon for total energy).
Now lets test that statement.
If mass could have a vector speed of the SOL all of the energy for the electron would be in the forward direction and non left for the cycle of the electron. The measurement of time would stop.
Mechanical and light clocks tick the same in every frame.
If the mass of a light clock could have a vector speed at the speed of light the photon would use all of its motion between the clocks and none for the bounce between the clocks. So the measurement of time would stop.
So can we agree clocks only measure the potential energy of a frame?
And timey is on the correct path of temporal relationship with gravity. But it is all in the gamma term of relativity for dilation.
The proof for energy being of the spectrum and not of mass is in the deceleration of mass. Deceleration causes gravity and your clock tick rate increases!!!
The center of a planet is equivalent to the inertial speed of a ship in space after acceleration. That is equivalency and measured by the tick rate in that frame.
Ignore me if you like. But what Einstein felt he was missing is a mechanical cause for relativity. Relativity itself I recognize as quite complete in its mathematics and description of what we observe. Failure of Relativity is choosing the wrong understanding of Relativity.
timey your h changes angle in different dilation and vector motions. Your base is total c which can never be measured as fixed using mass or the photon.
We only have equivalency between Pe measurement in GR and SR by the use of clocks. Its always a ratio between Pe and Ke in a frame.
BH;s are total Ke void of Pe.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...