0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It's better than leaving mass undefined.
Not only is it obvious that mass is defined
I have highlighted a few examples of utter nonsense for you.Feel free to replace them with something meaningful. Quote from: puppypower on 31/10/2021 18:21:08time potential;Quote from: puppypower on 31/10/2021 18:21:08 time potential.Quote from: puppypower on 31/10/2021 18:21:08 extra space is not needed to express the extra potential Quote from: puppypower on 31/10/2021 18:21:08 One could move in time without any entanglement with space ; omniscience, and/or move in space without any entanglement with time; omnipresent.
time potential;
time potential.
extra space is not needed to express the extra potential
One could move in time without any entanglement with space ; omniscience, and/or move in space without any entanglement with time; omnipresent.
via velocity; d/t
If we start with a particle that occupies a volume=V, and give the particle spin, the volume of space requirement does not change.
If we start with a particle that occupies a volume=V, and give the particle spin, the volume of space requirement does not change. The particle will still occupy volume =V. What does change is the frequency, which is defined as 1/time.
Separate potentials in space and in time can also exist without them being fully entangled with each other, on top of the matrix of space-time.
The usual definition of mass is circular.My definition says: mass is encoded by space points on a circle in a particle. Half of the circle is made of left-out points of space.
You keep insisting that particles don't spin, but they have a property analogous to spin.
This appeals to magic.
One property of mass is mass occupies space.