0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Electric current is defined as opposite of electron movement.It could be say the mixture of A and B .Jump From atom to atom nearly light speed and outher surface of the wire.The electron entering the wire is not the electron leaving from another side.This is all from my remembrance, could be wrong.
The conduction electrons in a metal are de-localised. That means that no individual electron 'belongs' to any atom, in particular. When a current flows, the conduction electrons all drift (very slowly - mms per second). A very small amonunt of energy is used up as they move through the lattice but that is the loss which we identify as Resistance.
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 15/02/2009 19:17:12The conduction electrons in a metal are de-localised. That means that no individual electron 'belongs' to any atom, in particular. When a current flows, the conduction electrons all drift (very slowly - mms per second). A very small amonunt of energy is used up as they move through the lattice but that is the loss which we identify as Resistance. []So if i think right you mean that A+C,,,C means that drift and loss means that A.What is you opinion about that magnetic-field idea?
Would you, for instance, have any numerical data to support your idea?Where does your 'matter' come from and how does it get replenished? Magnets don't get lighter with age.
I'm afraid that's nonsense.
Maybe there's something lost in the translation. There seems to be a vision there. I'm not sure it is a correct vision, but I would like to understand the vision. So I will continue to follow this thread and not relegate it to the trash heap just yet []
Where is the Science?
So,,this magnet-flow pull this iron to it's mass-centerpoint.
Quote So,,this magnet-flow pull this iron to it's mass-centerpoint.length center or mass center? Do you have this kind of experiment.