0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
According to J. Charles law ( 1787),when the temperature falls down on 1 degreethe volume decreases on 1/273. And when the temperature reaches -273 degrees the volume disappears and particles become "flat figures ". The " Charles law" was confirmed by other physicists: Gay-Lussac, Planck, Nernst, Einstein .
QuoteAccording to J. Charles law ( 1787),when the temperature falls down on 1 degreethe volume decreases on 1/273. And when the temperature reaches -273 degrees the volume disappears and particles become "flat figures ". The " Charles law" was confirmed by other physicists: Gay-Lussac, Planck, Nernst, Einstein .Can't pretend to follow most of what you said but surely the bit in quotes is an error? You're trying to apply a 'law' that was derived to describe the behaviour of gases (i.e. freely moving molecules with a typical energy distribution etc...) to a theory of how a photon behaves. To my mind, this is like trying to use Newton's law of gravitation to try to explain the workings of a digital watch. Never try to apply a rule out of its intended context - you'll just generate nonsense.
Planck, Nernst, Einstein confirmed the law for all particles of matter.
QuotePlanck, Nernst, Einstein confirmed the law for all particles of matter.Do you have a reference for this?=======================================The Charles law ( 1787) straight belong to the photon/ electron’s theory. The answer is simple.If I understood it, you can understand too.You aren’t child, whom I must explain every simple thing.I can't recall it from my days at University, nor have I been able to find anything relating Einstein, Planck or Nernst to Charles's law on the internet.- I'd like to see how (if?) their work was applied to photons as well as more classical particles.
If I understood it, you can understand too.You aren’t child, whom I must explain every simple thing.