0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
what is the universal terminal goal?
there are still persistent disagreements among philosophers.
A lot of what you call unsolved problems are not problems but misunderstandings.
At least anyone who has studied a bit of physics can use a Huygens construction to predict what you see.
Why should gravity and electromagnetism be related at all?
Wrong starting point. Why assume that there is or should be one? Anyway, ΔS > 0, whatever.
Researchers in AI safety is struggling with the goal alignment problem. What should entities much smarter than all of humans combined should align their goals to? Should they align their goals with us, humans who created them? Or should we humans align our goals with theirs instead?The question can't be answered without properly defining goal. It leads to the concept of consciousness, which also needs to be properly defined. Philosophers of the pasts have failed to reach a consensus because they haven't found workable definitions of those concepts.
The goal of any machine is determined by its creator. The only problem with AI is determining exactly who is legally liable for its output, and that will be resolved by a decision in a court of law.