0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
How did this devolve into a debate about politics?
Are we going to get back on topic soon, or am I going to have to split this thread?
As far as former VP Biden, maybe his impairment is not technically called Dementia, ...
One paradox of Darwinism, that shows there is something more, is homosexuality.
There is a departure from the expected reproductive protocol of biological Darwinism.
This observation appears to add up to choice and will power, as some level of the psyche. If this occurs deep enough and is therefore unconscious, it may feel instinctive or genetic, but really be an induced unconscious subroutine that is not genetic based.
The analogy would be a tall strong man who has selective advantage, but he does not reproduce himself in a biological fashion. In spite of this, children are born in his village that look and behave like him, generation after generation, with each generation that appear, also not reproducing. However, his features will turn up in children of those who reproduce but not with any of the noted offspring. This looks like osmotic version of sexual reproduction. That observation would void the theory of Evolution or it would suggest that there is a parallel path, based on choice and free will, that can occur after birth. This could be induced and/or copied behavior based on examples that already exist. This type of reproduction would be psychological; choice.
Indoctrination tries to mold behavior and choice around a desire path that may or may not be natural to the subjects being indoctrinated. They may not even know this change is occurring and is being induced. However, they will eventually appear to be driven by instinct. This can be accelerated via the carrot and stick.
The only significant forces at work "indoctrinating" people have been the bigots and the church seeking to tell people that "homoxesuality is evil" or "homosexuallity is unnatural" or "homosexuallity is wrong".So, if indoctrination had a dominant effect (spoiler alert- it doesn't) then homosxuallity would no longer exist.But, I guess your post is the sort of "logic" we should expect from someone who believes in homeopathy.
Darwinism; natural selection, requires sexual reproduction to pass forward genes to the future.
This is not a value judgment but a science observation that is conceptually inconsistent with the theory of Darwinism.
Don't let the politics of wishful thinking cloud your ability to think as a impartial scientist.