0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Is it possible for mass to be separate from energy?
.... you can read about it in my paper I wrote. This paper is published in an Indian journal. I forgot which one. It's also in a book. See http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0687
Describe the cause of a gravitational field. Mechanically what causes the field to exist in the presence of mass. And what is a mathematical gizmo? What is its shape and size?
Yes. In fact you can read about it in my paper I wrote. This paper is published in an Indian journal. I forgot which one. It's also in a book. See http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0687Equation 16 shows that the passive gravitational mass of a particle moving through a gravitational field is not related to energy at all. Its a function of rest mass, speed of the particle and the gravitational potential. The energy is the time component of the particles 1-form. The two are not equal to each other. They're not even proportional to each other.
Is the motion of the electron cloud related to energy?
Quote from: GoCIs the motion of the electron cloud related to energy?What motion are you referring to? The electron cloud is an informal term used to describe the probability of where electrons are around the nucleus of an atom. Such "clouds" are static having no motion that I'm aware of. If there were any motion, perhaps from the motion of the atom itself, then the cloud would still describe the probability of where the electrons are, but now the distribution won't be static.
Quote from: PmbPhy on 02/10/2015 14:51:12Quote from: GoCIs the motion of the electron cloud related to energy?What motion are you referring to? The electron cloud is an informal term used to describe the probability of where electrons are around the nucleus of an atom. Such "clouds" are static having no motion that I'm aware of. If there were any motion, perhaps from the motion of the atom itself, then the cloud would still describe the probability of where the electrons are, but now the distribution won't be static.Exactly!
Electrons or Electron clouds orbit the nucleus of atoms, in my opinion
Think about it, right hand rule
If we look at electron orbitals (the electron cloud) they have a variety of shapes, sphere, donut, bumbell lobes, and combinations of these. All we can say is that they describe a zone where the electron(s) are most likely to be found.
Do we visualize it as a cloud because of the electron speed?
Quote from: PmbPhy on 29/09/2015 15:38:55Yes. In fact you can read about it in my paper I wrote. This paper is published in an Indian journal. I forgot which one. It's also in a book. See http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0687Equation 16 shows that the passive gravitational mass of a particle moving through a gravitational field is not related to energy at all. Its a function of rest mass, speed of the particle and the gravitational potential. The energy is the time component of the particles 1-form. The two are not equal to each other. They're not even proportional to each other.Really Pete? no energy no mass, they are related, no mass no work, they are related. Force is a product of energy , no energy no force, no work, Your paper is wrong if you are suggesting there is no mass /energy relationship.