0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
363Licence required for use of TV receiver(1)A television receiver must not be installed or used unless the installation and use of the receiver is authorised by a licence under this Part.(2)A person who installs or uses a television receiver in contravention of subsection (1) is guilty of an offence.(3)A person with a television receiver in his possession or under his control who—(a)intends to install or use it in contravention of subsection (1), or(b)knows, or has reasonable grounds for believing, that another person intends to install or use it in contravention of that subsection,is guilty of an offence.(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.(5)Subsection (1) is not contravened by anything done in the course of the business of a dealer in television receivers solely for one or more of the following purposes—(a)installing a television receiver on delivery;(b)demonstrating, testing or repairing a television receiver.(6)The Secretary of State may by regulations exempt from the requirement of a licence under subsection (1) the installation or use of television receivers—(a)of such descriptions,(b)by such persons,(c)in such circumstances, and(d)for such purposes,as may be provided for in the regulations.(7)Regulations under subsection (6) may make any exemption for which such regulations provide subject to compliance with such conditions as may be specified in the regulations.
(1)A television receiver must not be installed or used unless the installation and use of the receiver is authorised by a licence under this Part.
In the UK we are forced to receive a signal in our homes of program viewing. For this forced act and dictatorship, we have to pay and are extorted a license fee.
“television receiver” means any apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose.
Would I be correct in assuming that if you had no TV receiver with an antenna, but you did have a computer connected to the internet, your household would still need to pay the "TV receiver license"?
In the UK we are forced to receive a signal in our homes of program viewing. For this forced act and dictatorship, we have to pay and are extorted a license fee.Not actually true.Why tell that lie?
Quite clearly the unwanted signal cannot be removed, believe me I have asked.
Quote from: Thebox on 25/02/2018 15:40:21Quite clearly the unwanted signal cannot be removed, believe me I have asked. It’s nothing to do with the signal, just you having a television.No one forces you to watch television, or even own one.If you give it away, or store it in your loft you dont have to pay.If you buy or modify one so that it only plays DVDs, you dont have to pay.
Quite clearly the act, is devised by the government for ''personal gain''.
No it's true,
No doubt the government are not paying tax
Television licensing failures should not result in a legal court case with no jurisdiction of rights. I
It is not a criminal offence because it is not stated.
a business forcing a signal on you cannot be a victim,
the people being forced to comply would be the victims,
As a business, the government is in trouble.
I charge the government with a criminal offence of aggravated trespass by use of signal .
A violation of entropy and it may even cause a person to time dilate, killing us off quicker.
Quite clearly the government are passing acts for personal gain in their moonlighted businesses. i.e extortion.
Acts that benefit their companies but are not lawful under freeman laws.
Under common law people have the right to face their accuser,
Under common law a transmitted carrier wave signal that was entering your dwelling is an aggravated trespass
They have no right to beam a signal at/in mine or anybodies else's dwelling.
You would have to feel sorry for the prosecution if the BBC ever tried to take me too court.
The aether is filled with a lot more than BBC transmissions. There are probably 500 or so radio and TV entertainment channels receivable by your TV set, hundreds of emergency service channels, mobile phone and internet services....and I've just had to but a 2160 channel radio for my plane (to replace the entirely adequate 720 channel unit that everyone else n the world uses, thanks to the stupidity of the British Government insisting that frequency allocation is a matter of national sovereignty rather than international common sense). Plus 180 navigational aids and a whole other area of the spectrum assigned to radar and longrange communication.....So who are you gong to sue?
Every object in your house is emitting microwave radiation.Are you going to sue those too?
I'm sure they would be happy to charge you for their time.Legal costs are usually awarded against the loser.Misunderstanding entropy isn't going to win you a court case.
As I said,Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/02/2018 17:23:04I'm sure they would be happy to charge you for their time.Legal costs are usually awarded against the loser.Misunderstanding entropy isn't going to win you a court case.