0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This thread is supposed to be in step #6.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 28/11/2022 06:19:51 This thread is supposed to be in step #6.You missed steps 3, 4 and 5.
I agreed to do the experiment
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 28/11/2022 13:34:07I agreed to do the experiment What experiment?
Constructivism sounds Better than blatant Criticism any day any time.Hopefully more Emphasis would be laid upon the Experiments, rather than the Experimenters.Wishing this OP leads into collaborative team work!👍
Experiments on diffraction of light, and microwave transceiver.
4. agree the critical experiment
I'm not the only one searching for the more accurate model of physical reality.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 29/11/2022 04:23:34Experiments on diffraction of light, and microwave transceiver.And with whom did you Quote from: alancalverd on 27/11/2022 11:31:104. agree the critical experiment ?Or did you just pick some that you liked?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/11/2022 08:43:16Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 29/11/2022 04:23:34Experiments on diffraction of light, and microwave transceiver.And with whom did you Quote from: alancalverd on 27/11/2022 11:31:104. agree the critical experiment ?Or did you just pick some that you liked?I picked the experiments based on their potential to eliminate wrong hypotheses, and within my financial budget and other resources. The only important agreement I needed was with the fund provider, which were me and my wife. It was a good thing that John Clauser kept going on with his experiment without agreement with Richard Feynman.
So, you didn't check that the experiment was useful?
What matters (i.e. what is useful) is an adequate model of reality, and the fact is that photon and wave models between them predict everything we observe about electromagnetic radiation, to an astonishing degree of accuracy. The time to look for a better model is surely when you discover a phenomenon that is not calculable with exiting models (which is how Planck got involved).
Do you have an inexplicable experimental result?
There may be many uses for an experiment.It may be entertaining.It may be educational.It may bring about scientific discovery.Any of those uses is fine, but only one is really science.
By having frequency and wavelength, we know that light is wavy. But there are more than one kind of waves, e.g. transversal/longitudinal, 1/2/3 dimensional, stationary/moving wave, etc. Which kind of wave most resembles light?Is it sound wave? Or wave on water surface, rope, string, slinky? Or seismogram? Or solar wind?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/11/2022 13:31:31There may be many uses for an experiment.It may be entertaining.It may be educational.It may bring about scientific discovery.Any of those uses is fine, but only one is really science.Scientific discoveries are not usually obvious until all of the pieces of puzzle are revealed.
My experiments on diffraction contradict Huygen's principle
My experiments on refraction using microwave contradict Fermat's principle.