0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: duffyd on 11/04/2020 14:12:36Would anyone care to explain who Jesus Christ really was?I’m not sure why you are asking this here. This is neither a religion site nor a history site, all you will get are opinions.This site, by its very nature, deals with the science of observation, experiment, models and predictions. What you are looking for won’t be found here.
Would anyone care to explain who Jesus Christ really was?
Yes, that's right.I tell the whole forum that you are not following the rules.
The scientific method identifies Who He is. Or does it? That's what I am exploring
Ignoring you is against the rules?
people who don't see the evidence that God exists.
Quote from: duffyd on 11/04/2020 21:49:12The scientific method identifies Who He is. Or does it? That's what I am exploringThat's a perfectly fine topic for discussion.But it's not the topic of this thread.Why are you cluttering this thread with it?Quote from: duffyd on 11/04/2020 21:53:04Ignoring you is against the rules?Refusing to address valid points means you are not debating, you are preaching.That's the breach of the rules. It has nothing to do with me.
Why are you debating this here?
Refusing to address valid points means you are not debating, you are preaching.
You made numerous unsubstantiated claims and ignored my pertinent questions
Quote from: duffyd on 11/04/2020 22:17:30Why are you debating this here?Because someone raised it here... that will have been... you.
Quote from: duffyd on 11/04/2020 22:23:38You made numerous unsubstantiated claims and ignored my pertinent questionsWhat pertinent questions have I ignored?
You refuse to define evidence.
Evidence is a reason to think that what you say is true.
You made them. It is not my job to inform you specifically.
Quote from: duffyd on 11/04/2020 22:27:30 You refuse to define evidence. Nope.Here's where I defined it (albeit in another topic)Quote from: Bored chemist on 02/04/2020 20:53:22Evidence is a reason to think that what you say is true.I have clearly not refused to define it.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/04/2020 22:37:41Quote from: duffyd on 11/04/2020 22:27:30 You refuse to define evidence. Nope.Here's where I defined it (albeit in another topic)Quote from: Bored chemist on 02/04/2020 20:53:22Evidence is a reason to think that what you say is true.I have clearly not refused to define it.You play games. Put it in your own words. I told you I am not chasing links. Just define evidence
Quote from: duffyd on 11/04/2020 22:30:15You made them. It is not my job to inform you specifically.Yes it is.Also, if you don't, it looks as if you admit that you made it up.
I read everything you wrote and it is obvious you don't know much about these figures