0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Get back to us if that happens.Until then, please don't try to raise it on a science page.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 10/03/2022 13:05:36Get back to us if that happens.Until then, please don't try to raise it on a science page.I must post it somewhere where scientists have access to it to inform them to be on the lookout.
For a computer to think you need some operator to load and run the program. Who does this for Humans?
There must be momentum non-conservation even if the soul is made out of energy.
The fact of the matter is that you can't justify one speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum by pointing out a different speculative case of violation of momentum.
It can become science if a lot of people experience it for themselves.
I must post it somewhere where scientists have access to it to inform them to be on the lookout.
Can you tell us how to have this experience?
Just observe a Pi-minus decay,
Just observe a Pi-minus decay, and be sure to be the only one observing it.
Just observe a Pi-minus decay
How? Be specific. Explain it to me like I'm 5 years old.
Not if the soul has momentum, but like I said before:
For a computer to think you need some operator to load and run the program. Who does this for Humans?Embryonic development.
God starts the program in babies. He says: "live" and then the mind boots up.
Go to a particle accelerator with a cloud chamber detector and stare at it.
The soul causes new thoughts, so whether the momentum starts in ions in the brain or in the soul, since the soul starts new mental processes, it creates momentum from nothing.
you can't justify one speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum by pointing out a different speculative case of violation of momentum.
If I do sense something, how I am supposed to know it's pion decay and not neutron decay or something else?
That's not how that works. When you start a car and it begins to move forward, momentum wasn't created from nothing. It's pushing back on the road just as much as the road is pushing forward on it. That means the total momentum hasn't changed. There's no reason to believe that such would not also be true of a soul causing movement.
What then stops the soul from exiting the brain?
They can produce a Pi-minus.
To balance the momentum of the ions, the soul must have momentum in the opposite direction. What then stops the soul from exiting the brain?
No, I'm asking how I'm supposed to know that any particular thing I happen to see in my mind is supposed to represent any specific particle?
You also didn't address my issue about you not being at a particle accelerator yourself.
Your particle violates momentum conservation. It's falsified.
Presumably whatever keeps the soul from exiting your brain when you walk.
but I saw a pi-minus decay.
They look at the decay products
and if the trajectory makes a great circle in a magnetic field.
I said I weren't at a particle accelerator.
It is hard to believe but I saw a pi-minus decay.
It does not violate momentum conservation since L0 does not carry momentum.
That means the soul's momentum must be cancelled - violating momentum conservation.
Who is "they"?
And how is that supposed to tell me what particles I am seeing?
And how do you know that's what you observed? Give me a good line of reasoning that what you saw in your head specifically represented such a thing.
That's exactly why it does violate conservation of momentum. When it interacts with another particle, it must transfer energy to that particle. That changes the second particle's momentum.
You can't justify one speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum by pointing out a different speculative case of violation of conservation of momentum.
I know because I felt the L0 entering my mind.