0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
AbstractThe large burden of sulfate aerosols injected into the stratosphere by the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991 cooled Earth and enhanced the destruction of polar ozone in the subsequent few years. The continuous injection of sulfur into the stratosphere has been suggested as a “geoengineering” scheme to counteract global warming. We use an empirical relationship between ozone depletion and chlorine activation to estimate how this approach might influence polar ozone. An injection of sulfur large enough to compensate for surface warming caused by the doubling of atmospheric CO2 would strongly increase the extent of Arctic ozone depletion during the present century for cold winters and would cause a considerable delay, between 30 and 70 years, in the expected recovery of the Antarctic ozone hole.
Here I am, still waiting for any environmental phenomena to be definitively linked to chemtrails. Doesn't look like I'm going to ever get it...
Don't get blinded by the suggestions made in this study. Solar geoengineering is clandestine research disguised as a philanthropy. It is illegal strictly in the political sense because our governments declines its existence. Clandestine research is pseudoscience to me.
Quote from: Kryptid on 11/04/2017 21:28:09Here I am, still waiting for any environmental phenomena to be definitively linked to chemtrails. Doesn't look like I'm going to ever get it...Don't get blinded by the suggestions made in this study. Solar geoengineering is clandestine research disguised as a philanthropy. It is illegal strictly in the political sense because our governments declines its existence. Clandestine research is pseudoscience to me.
I bother to educate the mass about the obfuscation of clandestine geoengineering research.
Chemtrails are not dumped when the wind is blowing.
Chemtrails are not dumped when the wind is blowing. It reduces the albedo the day after they sprayed their stuff, by producing a haze. If this is not evidence of the deliberate injections of aerosols in the troposphere, I don't know what is a evidence.
Quote from: tkadm30 on 20/04/2017 20:14:02Chemtrails are not dumped when the wind is blowing.Another claim in need of support.
It's called a observational evidence.
If a study has indeed been done that correlates the occurrence (or non-occurrence) of chemtrails with local wind speed, please provide us with a link to the study.
What is the point in linking a study
if you fail to observe the basics of geoengineering?
I suggest you take the time needed to observe the phenomenon in situ.
You have yet to establish that geoengineering of the type you are talking about even exists.
Ah! The irony! Unless you want to ignore the plethora of scientific articles discussing the role of solar geoengineering in mitigating climate change,
We have explained this to you before; please try to understand it.
I don't believe the nonsense that theses "experiments" are being done only in laboratory conditions
Ah! The irony! Unless you want to ignore the plethora of scientific articles discussing the role of solar geoengineering in mitigating climate change
the burden of proof is on you my friend...