0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/04/2018 22:04:13Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 19:21:35Please show me where my logic is wrong, I would love to be proved wrong then I can give up. When did you adopt this refreshing new policy?Is that a counter argument or to change the discussion ? Try again
Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 19:21:35Please show me where my logic is wrong, I would love to be proved wrong then I can give up. When did you adopt this refreshing new policy?
Please show me where my logic is wrong, I would love to be proved wrong then I can give up.
Pseudoscience, logorrhea and a childish rant discredit their author without the need fo third-party intervention. Sound and fury can be entertaining on a stage, but this garbage is just boring.
Quote from: jeffreyH on 14/04/2018 14:34:05conceit.I would not say conceit, more annoyed that I do not seem to be getting anywhere when on a lot of things I am obviously right.
conceit.
Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 14:39:30Quote from: jeffreyH on 14/04/2018 14:34:05conceit.I would not say conceit, more annoyed that I do not seem to be getting anywhere when on a lot of things I am obviously right. If you were "obviously right" then you would be getting somewhere.You are not, because you are not..
scientists really are fearing there jobs will be lost.
Quote from: Thebox on 15/04/2018 14:31:43 scientists really are fearing there jobs will be lost. All over the world, every day, scientists are working towards falsifying the current ideas. That's how science makes progress. We test ideas and throw out the ones that don't work.Why would scientists fear your ideas, even if there were not nonsense?
The metric expansion is caused by Quantum field density radial increase. dr1.jpg (50.27 kB . 1914x907 - viewed 4233 times)The world is getting very close to me saying ''stuff'' it. I and my mind will be lost for all time.
Quote from: Thebox on 16/04/2018 12:36:46The metric expansion is caused by Quantum field density radial increase. dr1.jpg (50.27 kB . 1914x907 - viewed 4233 times)The world is getting very close to me saying ''stuff'' it. I and my mind will be lost for all time. Thank you for the pseudoscience as one more example that you don't know what you're talking about. Science isn't merely about making a claim and the world admiring you for it. Its about supplying solid adequate reasons and then providing predictions from the theory which have never been made before. All see from you is speculation, which anybody can do. E.g. "God is pulling on the fabric of spacetime and that's the reason for the expansion of the universe." There ya go. Now prove me wrong. I dare ya. I double dog dare ya. No, wait!!! I TRIPLE dog dare ya!
Space expanding, more lies, two adjoined points of space can not be displaced to leave space between the points. You are displacing the points not the spaceCheck mate.
Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 13:48:57Space expanding, more lies, two adjoined points of space can not be displaced to leave space between the points. You are displacing the points not the spaceCheck mate.Hasn't it already been proven that space is expanding? Please do give me a theory of events leading up to today that in you're mind proves that space expansion is a lie! For a start if it wasn't expanding then why is their distance between objects, why are stars etc so far from each other. Basically what you are saying is lies, without expansion we would literally not be able to exist.
I have told science for ages that their semantics sucks, read what Wiki says.[3] Due to the non-intuitive nature of the subject and what has been described by some as "careless" choices of wording, certain descriptions of the metric expansion of space and the misconceptions to which such descriptions can lead are an ongoing subject of discussion within education and communication of scientific concepts.[4][5][6][7]They accept the wording and semantics sucks, I can correct this and they ignore this. Space is not expanding, field density increase is happening and point sources are moving apart. The big bang is wrong and right. Space pre-existed before the big bang. This space is the nothing before the big bang, it is made of nothing. Light and dark, time, matter, does not exist before the big bang. ok?
p.s space as never been proved to be expanding.
The American astronomer Edwin Hubble made the observations in 1925 and was the first to prove that the universe is expanding. He proved that there is a direct relationship between the speeds of distant galaxies and their distances from Earth. This is now known as Hubble's Law.
Quote from: Thebox on 16/04/2018 17:11:47Quote from: atbsphotography on 16/04/2018 17:06:08Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 13:48:57Space expanding, more lies, two adjoined points of space can not be displaced to leave space between the points. You are displacing the points not the spaceCheck mate.Hasn't it already been proven that space is expanding? Please do give me a theory of events leading up to today that in you're mind proves that space expansion is a lie! For a start if it wasn't expanding then why is their distance between objects, why are stars etc so far from each other. Basically what you are saying is lies, without expansion we would literally not be able to exist. I have told science for ages that their semantics sucks, read what Wiki says.[3] Due to the non-intuitive nature of the subject and what has been described by some as "careless" choices of wording, certain descriptions of the metric expansion of space and the misconceptions to which such descriptions can lead are an ongoing subject of discussion within education and communication of scientific concepts.[4][5][6][7]They accept the wording and semantics sucks, I can correct this and they ignore this. Space is not expanding, field density increase is happening and point sources are moving apart. The big bang is wrong and right. Space pre-existed before the big bang. This space is the nothing before the big bang, it is made of nothing. Light and dark, time, matter, does not exist before the big bang. ok?Firstly if you are sourcing information from Wikipedia it can be edited by just about everyone and for this reason, it isn't always to be trusted.Secondly, the only thing you may have right here is that the space that the universe could expand in already existed, also I don't believe in field density, purely cause it can be attributed to things such as soil and sand. And as such, it wouldn't have a use in the expansion of the universe. The universe is expanding, therefore, it is becoming less dense. If the universe was to contract then it would become denser and as such field density would have a bearing here. Checkmate again MrBox
Quote from: atbsphotography on 16/04/2018 17:06:08Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 13:48:57Space expanding, more lies, two adjoined points of space can not be displaced to leave space between the points. You are displacing the points not the spaceCheck mate.Hasn't it already been proven that space is expanding? Please do give me a theory of events leading up to today that in you're mind proves that space expansion is a lie! For a start if it wasn't expanding then why is their distance between objects, why are stars etc so far from each other. Basically what you are saying is lies, without expansion we would literally not be able to exist. I have told science for ages that their semantics sucks, read what Wiki says.[3] Due to the non-intuitive nature of the subject and what has been described by some as "careless" choices of wording, certain descriptions of the metric expansion of space and the misconceptions to which such descriptions can lead are an ongoing subject of discussion within education and communication of scientific concepts.[4][5][6][7]They accept the wording and semantics sucks, I can correct this and they ignore this. Space is not expanding, field density increase is happening and point sources are moving apart. The big bang is wrong and right. Space pre-existed before the big bang. This space is the nothing before the big bang, it is made of nothing. Light and dark, time, matter, does not exist before the big bang. ok?
Quotep.s space as never been proved to be expanding.Is that so? QuoteThe American astronomer Edwin Hubble made the observations in 1925 and was the first to prove that the universe is expanding. He proved that there is a direct relationship between the speeds of distant galaxies and their distances from Earth. This is now known as Hubble's Law.