0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The hoax was proven a long time ago.
What I hypothesize
..in the later missions might not have been exactly half-speed. It might have been ...
One possible explanation is that...
There are plausible explanations that would explain them.
The main reason they had to fake it was probably space radiation.
Speculation does not equal evidence, especially when your premise contradicts your findings.
I await Cosmored's "unworldly" explanation of that picture.
That's why I asked you for your best single piece of evidence that Apollo was a simulation.
It's an extraordinary claim accusing hundreds of thousands of people, agencies and governments of the most spectacular fraud in the history of civilisation.
Watch those then go herehttp://www.clavius.org/index.htmland see them explained away.
The flag moves at the exact moment when it's consistent witht the atmosphere explanation.
QuoteThe flag moves at the exact moment when it's consistent witht the atmosphere explanation. You really think so? The astronaut seems far enough away that it would take a second for any wind currents he made to reach the flag, and the flag starts moving exactly as he bounces. Seems to me like it moved from the vibrations.
You really think so? The astronaut seems far enough away that it would take a second for any wind currents he made to reach the flag, and the flag starts moving exactly as he bounces. Seems to me like it moved from the vibrations.
And doesn't move when he initially walks away from it, which would have created the same kinds of currents.
Also, I'm not at all convinced that it moves before he gets to it.
QuoteI await Cosmored's "unworldly" explanation of that picture.Are you saying that picture wasn't fakable? Anything that's fakable can't be used as proof.
I don't even think the moon is real. I think it's a big balloon hoax to make us think we have a natural satellite.