0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The heat source is a hole, the heat is and was never provident from the atomic structure but from the background, atoms and particles are the means to, the temperatures happens and belongs to dark energy, so why a hole is attracted to the other? The same reason why two holes in a water pool will always become one, "momentum"... Add a great attractor that is adding momentum to the universe sphere, and anything existing within the exited dark energy flow, will inevitable receive momentum, gravity, as consequence, the objective? Be pulled inside and towards the source of the movement, just like a cyclone.... But in this scenario you have, local cyclonic, I mean local spheres of gravity, that grant you local momentum, picture the universe as large flat horizontal disk of a cyclone, with a sphere like black hole object in the middle adding heat, destroying matter, producing dark energy, giving it momentum, and the galaxies are medium cyclones, and the solar systems even smaller cyclones, but at the end all are the same event... Remove the heat from the rocks possession and attribute it to the background, will make kind of sense...
this is very interesting, but totally wrong... on so many levels...
A heated rock will share its heat with a cold rock, why does the heat travel to the cold rock ?
Well! Hmmm! HUh?Heat is a part of our sensory perception, heat is a feeling and not a thing.
Quote from: Thebox on 14/08/2016 07:48:54Well! Hmmm! HUh?Heat is a part of our sensory perception, heat is a feeling and not a thing.Heat is a measure of molecular activity Mr. Box. And therefore, is most assuredly a "thing". I fail to see any relevance nor any profit to be realized from your continual quibbling over meaningless, frivolous and contestable positions which always lead to zero productivity. But then again, that is exactly your aim isn't it Mr. Box? Stay confused Mr. Box in the hopes that it might rub off on the rest of us. I wouldn't be holding my breath if I were you...................................
Wrong Ethos, temperature is a measure of molecular activity, heat is what is felt.
Quote from: Thebox on 15/08/2016 09:47:19Wrong Ethos, temperature is a measure of molecular activity, heat is what is felt. I'll have to give you that one Mr. Box. Words do have meaning don't they? However, because heat is a form of energy, and Webster's defines "heat" as a noun, please remember the definition for a noun: Noun..............Person, Place or "Thing"So when you say; "heat is a feeling not a thing", you are WRONG as well.
Quote from: Ethos_ on 15/08/2016 13:49:47Quote from: Thebox on 15/08/2016 09:47:19Wrong Ethos, temperature is a measure of molecular activity, heat is what is felt. I'll have to give you that one Mr. Box. Words do have meaning don't they? However, because heat is a form of energy, and Webster's defines "heat" as a noun, please remember the definition for a noun: Noun..............Person, Place or "Thing"So when you say; "heat is a feeling not a thing", you are WRONG as well.Ever thought the definition is wrong?