1
New Theories / is the big bang correct?
« on: 24/02/2009 14:15:17 »Quote
If you calculate 6000km-diameter ball energy-amount at lava-temperature,,,my thought is that surface level must much more warm be.
It's a 6000km radius, not diameter(the diagram even shows that). And you keep mentioning 'calculating it', did you do this or did you just make this all up? One major thing you likely didn't factor into your 'calculations' was the extreme pressure at the depths of the Earth's core.
Quote
6000-km diameter ball and if it is full of 600-800C temperature matter then it's thermal power is so big that this 30km thin layer-surface cannot be so good thermal insulation.
Why not? Oven gloves can insulate you from 100 C of heat very well and they are at most a centimetre thick, besides, Earth starts to get very hot before you reach this 30km depth, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole so I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with :s.
Quote
Example moon,,,if moon get layers,,cave,,oil-pocket etc,,then can comes heat,,lava,etc.
The moon is made from layers(like almost every planet/moon in this solar system/universe), including magma so what are you talking about?
Quote
But do whole universe has same life-cyccle?
No idea, nor will we.
I can't be bothered to post any more as you haven't bothered researching any of this and are just making random assertions.