1
New Theories / Re: ANTI MATER PROPOSAL
« on: 09/02/2016 02:03:44 »I BELIEVE ANY MATER THAT ENTERS A BLACK HOLE THERE IS AN OUT FLUX OF ANTI MATER OR DARK MATER
Why not?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I BELIEVE ANY MATER THAT ENTERS A BLACK HOLE THERE IS AN OUT FLUX OF ANTI MATER OR DARK MATER
It will not be surprising if you have not heard of Pascual Jordan because though he may have been the foremost founder and developer of Quantum Mechanics as well as a friend of the other developers Jordan was a member of the Nazi Party, and his name was ALMOST erased from history. Jordan is also founder of the 'Zero Energy Universe' theory. http://www.britannica.com/biography/Pascual-Jordan. This post originated from a conversation with Space Flow, a member of this forum.
As you know the Consensus is that the universe expanded from a singularity .. the Big Bang .. while the consensus says Dark Energy drives expansion. I believe Dark Energy is probably a reality .. but that there was no Singularity and no Big Bang .. rather cosmic Voids and Matter both arose from nothing due to Jordan's 'quantum fluctuations' across what became the space of what became the universe, matter arising from nothing an idea proposed by Jordan, who was said to have 'stunned' Einstein by his revelation that 'the stars arose from nothing.' Einstein is said to have 'stopped in his tracks' as he crossed a street in Princeton, when told of Jordan's revelation by George Gamow .. the theory now known as the Zero Energy Universe. "Pascual Jordan first suggested that since the positive energy of a star’s mass and the negative energy of its gravitational field together may have zero total energy, conservation of energy would not prevent a star being created by a quantum transition of the vacuum." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_universe. "George Gamow recounted putting this idea to Albert Einstein: “Einstein stopped in his tracks and, since we were crossing a street, several cars had to stop to avoid running us down." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_universe
However, Voids had not been discovered in Jordan's time, so could not have contemplated Voids' part in the cosmos .. I believe it is anti-gravity energy in Voids which prevent matter arising in the Voids, and that energy drives the Voids expansion, which drives the expansion of Space, as well as driving the scattered matter of stars and galaxies into what is known as filaments.
There it is, a theory which explains many mysteries of the Big Bang which is now almost defunct now that the CMB radiation has proven to be heat from dust.
The entirety of a void is mass and is made of ghost particles with a negative value.
That is all I am saying on the matter.
Anti-matter should have anti-mass, perhaps. If so, light cannot be anti-matter because photons can have mass. In fact .. photonic molecules have been created. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/167439-mit-and-harvard-create-new-lightsaber-like-state-of-matter-photonic-molecules
An impossibility regardless what they say or think, positive and positive can not bond together they can only expand.
Regardless of what you think you should at least read what they have to say.
I read enough .
''These photonic molecules have been theorized to exist'' this does not mean they exist.
The Speed of Light:
E=mc2 is a popular, powerful formula that needs a deterministic explanation. How is mass simply converted to energy and vice versa. Postulate that there is no conversion. The energy is simply trapped and localized. Understanding how energy can be trapped in a location begins to describe the connection between the fundamental laws of the universe.
Photons are energy in the form of electromagnetic waves. All energy from gammas rays to radio waves are simply photons of different wavelengths. If we could break down these waves in a single quanta or unit, you would have a single photon.
The first major assumption of Space Compression Spring Theory is that space has structure and photons are traveling compressions of space.
Picture space as a super phase structure that could be modeled as a three dimensional web of points connected by infinitely small springs. Basically a spring matrix of hypercubes. Space is compressible (and decompressible). Photons travel through space in the form of energy. A photon traveling through space has a compression in the front and a decompression trailing similar to a longitudinal wave on a spring, but will have physical effects three dimensionally on the space around it.
Picture the photon as a car with a front and back seat. The positive charge would be pointing out the top of the sunroof over the front seats. A negative charge would be pointing out the bottom of the rear axle underneath the back seats. A positive magnetic field would extend out from the front passenger side door and a negative magnetic field would extend out the rear driver’s side door. The compression area is the front seats and the decompression occurs in the back seats.
The speed of photons has been measured as a constant in nature, but space compressions will have an effect on the propagation speed because this speed is based on the properties of the medium the photon propagates through - space. I have derived velocity formulas that show the speed of a photon is slower in decompressed space and faster in compressed space. The difference in speed provides a mechanism for the photons to get trapped in orbit around each other. If the photon has enough energy (or compression) it will create a velocity gradient enough to slow down the "tires" of another photon while the "roof" of the photon at a faster speed turns the complete photon. Basically this a gradient in the index of refraction of space causing the two photons to continuosly refract around each other.
Photons trapped in orbit around each other are the fundamental building blocks of matter.
Now to finally address the rhetorical question - I propose that time is constant but the velocity of light changes. This is the mechanism by which time appears to "slow down" in a gravity well - or space decompression area. The matter consisting of photons in orbit will experience time dilation because the speed of their photons is slower in decompressed space and the orbit cycles take longer.
In addition, matter traveling through space at a high velocity will also experience time dilation because the velocity component of the combined orbital system will be subtracted from the radial orbital component so the orbital cycles will take longer.
Time is constant, we just perceive that time slows down because the photons we are made of travel slower.
This makes the perception of the speed of light the same for any observer.
Quote from: Space Flow on 30 January 2016, 13:41:00I see.
Quote from: Alohascope on 30 January 2016, 09:40:45
now that the Cosmic Background Radiation 'evidence' is proven to be just heat from dust
You have mentioned this on several occasions now.
What proof are you referring to?
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/cosmic-inflation-b-modes-signal-just-dust-0203201523/
OK, how do I put this?
That was a claim for the detection of Primordial Gravitational Waves, within the light of the CMB. If it was true, it would have gone a long way into confirming "Inflation Theory".
As you see it wasn't a feature of the CMB at all but very rapidly spinning dust grains in our own Galaxy producing those B-Mode polarization signals.
That means that it wasn't a part of the CMB.
Not that that accounts for the CMB.
Two totally separate and different things.
Hope that helps.
It seems that most things have an opposite either in existence or in theory such as Matter and anti-matter. Does this extend to Light. Rather than just dark or the absence of light is there such a thing as "Dark-Light"?
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/cosmic-inflation-b-modes-signal-just-dust-0203201523/now that the Cosmic Background Radiation 'evidence' is proven to be just heat from dustYou have mentioned this on several occasions now.
What proof are you referring to?
now that the Cosmic Background Radiation 'evidence' is proven to be just heat from dustYou have mentioned this on several occasions now.
What proof are you referring to?
When photons interacts with the charges on atoms, the charges will attempt to align their EM wave with the EM wave of the photon. But because the charge is attached to an atom, there is a time delay in the EM field of the charge, due to the constraints of inertia. The charge is heavier and and will follow the EM wave of the photon, but will lag behind. The result is the two waves can add to create a composite wave that reflects the photon-charge system. This is represented below.
Conceptually, there is no reason this can't be scaled up, where two photons are interacting with two separate but close charges, to get two composite waves, which themselves add to form a larger composite wave. This allows the two waves of two photons to act like they are part of one wave; mediated by matter. The particles remain distinct, so when the composite comes undone; exit, the particles reestablish their normal distinct waves.
Wow .. someone who sounds like they actually know something! Not that the others here don't sound like they know something, they do, I hope I don't get myself into trouble here for a compliment.
The main difference between your proposal and mine seems to be that Voids are, in your proposal, growing because matter flows towards matter, while in mine matter is pushed towards matter by the growth of the Voids because of what is happening inside the Void .. the void pushing at Spacetime as well as matter.Yes the end result is the same. Yet I can show the flow patterns and spectroscopically backed up movements in support of Space Flow's interpretation. The above linked 3D mapping clearly shows matter streaming towards higher concentrations of matter and therefore away from the voids.
You may have to come up with some sort of corroborating evidence to support your view of a push out of the voids that can explain the movement patterns we are observing. I would have expected that if your anti-gravity void effect was real that the voids would be more spherical with an even push out on all sides. That is certainly not what we observe.
Anti-matter should have anti-mass, perhaps. If so, light cannot be anti-matter because photons can have mass. In fact .. photonic molecules have been created. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/167439-mit-and-harvard-create-new-lightsaber-like-state-of-matter-photonic-molecules
An impossibility regardless what they say or think, positive and positive can not bond together they can only expand.
What happens when we die? Pointless question because
(a) you will find out soon enough, and
(b) you can't do anything about it.
However you can live in the certainty that nobody has ever come back with a photograph, so everything you have ever been told about it is guesswork at best and cynical lies at worst.
What happens when we die? Pointless question becauseWe will worship God who created us .. for eternity .. thanks to Jesus Christ who died for our sins, who rose from the dead to prove resurrection, to ascended to heaven to prove that we too will be resurrected and ascend.
(a) you will find out soon enough, and
(b) you can't do anything about it.
However you can live in the certainty that nobody has ever come back with a photograph, so everything you have ever been told about it is guesswork at best and cynical lies at worst.
I have to start with I don't know.Jewish Pharisees and Saduccees were divided about the afterlife and soul .. but Jesus died for all men so the Pharisees and Saducees will be in heaven for eternal life with God with the Muslims and even the Baptists who say alcohol is evil.
Having that disclaimer out of the way lets do some speculating.
I am not religious and this is not to my understanding a religious site, so lets stay away from all the different superstitions.
Science tells us that for the Universe to operate as we observe it operating, then it follows some laws that can't be broken.
One of these laws is that all information is conserved. It can not be lost to the Universe.
Now we know that all that makes you what you are, (different to me) can theoretically be accounted for as an amount of information. That includes your own personal very complex but finite Electromagnetic pattern.
While you live parts of that pattern is continually subject to change. Ageing, learning, etc. These are all changes that a living organism goes through. At the moment of death all changes to the physical "you", stop.
Death therefore stops change for the complete assemblage of information that constitutes you. Yes some parts move on and keep changing, like your body decomposing, but that is no longer information that effects the complete structure that represented you.
So we come to your question. What happens to the information that represented you?
Does it get lost to the Universe?
All I know is, Science says this can not be so.
That's all I have. As I said at the top. I do not know.
Maybe someone else can expand on that, with hopefully logical argument or speculation.
Otherwise we will be left with all the superstitious drivel, and honestly that never helps anyone.