1
New Theories / Re: Coulomb Electric Gravity, Unified Ether Theory
« on: 15/09/2018 19:13:57 »You say the 2 molecules weigh different, I say same 128 amu.But it says nothing about how the two different molecules would weigh with a scale balance.Yes, it does.
Gravitational mass and inertial mass have been shown to be the same in every single experiment that looked at the question.
It is currently known to be true within 1 part in 10^17
https://web.archive.org/web/20100401114244/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/PAG/index_files/Page1098.htm
Quote from: Bored chemist
I posed the wrong question. Just go back to NaF.Again, can you tell me the element mass composition of octanone or napthalene in amu.What do you mean?
There is nothing particularly special about them- they just happen to have the same mass number.
You can find data on them on wiki.
I used this calculator to get the true masses
https://www.sisweb.com/referenc/tools/exactmass.htm
There are others.
The masses are going to be correct to within a part in a million.
If you want to look up the error analysis, I'm sure you can find it on-line somewhere.
Give me the mass composition of NaF in Na/F. Where do you get the data. Give some idea of error estimate? Hope I get my data this 3rd time asking.
Quote from: Bored chemist
And if Lorentz law didn't work then a lot of equipment like magnetrons and cyclotrons would fail."magnetrons and cyclotrons would fail" No! They would run as usual as long as the power plug is plug to a power point. Only thing is: "Anything in, garbage out" from those equipments.
So , we know it works.
Please know that my mentioned 2 papers earlier demolish all of current modern physics - all known modern relativistic physics - CERN, Standard model,...It is like a tsunami covering every inch of the earth surface! And what you see when the waters go away is what is the equivalent in the landscape of the physics world from my 2 papers. Nothing familiar remains!
Now you know why they should actually give me the Nobel prize in physics 2009!
Quote from: Bored chemist
How would you explain how two ions- derived from octanone and from naphthalene give apparently different masses in a mass spectrometer?You ask: "How would the Lorentz force "know" to treat them differently?"
How would the Lorentz force "know" to treat them differently?
Answer: "How would I know how the Lorentz force know!"
In ancient times, when an apple falls on a persons head, he learns to avoid walking under an apple tree!
Quote from: Bored chemist
Also, because you have (laughably) refused to find out how mass spectrometers work, you don't understand that some of them don't rely on magnetic fields to separate different masses.Tell me other than electric and magnetic deflections, whats the other. [I may be wrong again]
In those machines Lorentz force is irrelevant.
How do you explain why machines that use magnetic fields give the same result as those which do not?
Chan Rasjid.