1
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Negative Space?
« on: 20/10/2022 23:11:09 »We have not proven the existence of a quantifiable true negative value for space in our universe.That is true, but what in the world would negative space be anyway?Most occurrences of negativity can be summarized as positive but in the opposite direction of a vector, frequency(ie spin), or charge.Neither frequency nor charge are vectors.Wouldn't it stand to reason that if the universe has a sort of fundamental consistency to it, there should be negative space?What do you mean by "fundamental consistency". I don't see any reason (or even a possibility) for negative space.That if you go small enough you pass the threshold "0" and then begin to move positive in the opposite direction. The idea I had is that what if that is all a dimension is, a positive and negative space of a prior dimension. A cube is just 2 planes connected across some sort of "bridge" between them. What if that "bridge" is the "0" value of that space. If so could that be where anti matter is? Is a collision between particles that produces anti matter just a relapse effect across the "bridge"?That doesn't make much sense as stated.A part of this idea that came to mind for me also, was the existence of super positions. If Negative Space is real, that would mean that the extents could be equal to Positive Space. Meaning that position should also be equal but across the "bridge". This would mean that two objects could exist in the same "position" relative to their native space.So this is just a WAG, was a bong involved at all in this conjecture?
This is just a shower though conjecture.I'm a computer science major, so forgive me if I am lacking in knowledge. In most 3D/CAD programs this is how negative scale operates by flipping vertex data to negative values reversing triangles. Since we see more similarities between our world and the digital one as tech advances, I thought the question worth asking.What is with computer science guys going to science forums and making WAGs, it seems to be a thing...Edit: Another thought to expand upon this idea of Negative Space. Since mass "sags" spacetime, could it be pressing on the boundary between Positive and Negative Space if Negative Space is real. If that's the case could gravity be a byproduct due to the space expanding. We theorize space expands, if that's the case could Negative Space be doing the same in mirror? If so, would it be pulling things across the boundary due to "pressing" on the boundary?No.I am trying to be very careful to not speak of this like fact cause in.my head it makes sense. It is merely a conjecture though and I want to make that clear.No need to worry it is abundantly clear.
It probably makes sense in your head because you do not know much physics. The believability of your idea is inversely proportional to the amount of physics you know.
Really appreciate your feed back. Would have preferred to receive more of a guiding effect on it but I see your point.
As for my thoughts on what spawned the thought of negative space it was thinking about what black holes are. I just began to wonder if you take a point in space at any frame in time, and decreased the length of that point infinitely across all 3 vectors where would you go if it was possible. I know that we don't know if there is an absolute "small", and theorize our smallest particles and sub particles as points particles. My thoughts were, if there is an absolute small, a "0", then could you go beyond it. Would the space expand into a super positional space overlapping our own, as a negative is just positive in the opposite direction. I am using any given point as the origin for this idea with change happening across all 3 axis together.
Now if that's just absolutely impossible, not that we know if anything is 100% impossible, then ok I can live with that. I just thought the idea was worth throwing around, or asking about.
Also I would like to point out I never called charges nor frequencies vectors. I said that Vectors, Frequencies, and Charges have negative counterparts to their positive ones.
I do not know what a WAG is, I am new to the forum this being my first post. I had a question and wanted an answer or correction, not insults and literally no helpfulness. You provided nothing to validate your own intelligence not that you should need to, but merely insulted flagrantly. Was hoping to find other people looking to enjoy discussions or be enough of an intellectual to provide guidance, yet I found you.